Journal of ISSN: 2373-6410JNSK

Neurology & Stroke
Opinion
Volume 3 Issue 2 - 2015
Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke, What Is Behind The Detrimental Effects of General Anesthesia?
Gustavo J Rodriguez*, Alberto Maud and Salvador Cruz-Flores
Neurology Department, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center of El Paso, USA
Received:October 28, 2015| Published: October 29, 2015
*Corresponding author: Gustavo J Rodriguez, MD, Associate Professor and Vice Chair, Neurology Department, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center of El Paso, Texas, USA, Email:
Citation: Rodriguez GJ, Maud A, Cruz-Flores S (2015) Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke, What Is Behind The Detrimental Effects of General Anesthesia?. J Neurol Stroke 3(2): 00087. DOI: 10.15406/jnsk.2015.03.00087

Opinion

In recent years there have been several publications regarding a worse clinical outcome with the use of general anesthesia compared to conscious sedation during mechanical thrombectomy [1,2]. Given the high level of evidence for the efficacy of the endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke, the use of general anesthesia becomes problematic and therefore in those cases it would be reasonable to attempt the use of conscious sedation. Nonetheless, in certain scenarios, general anesthesia becomes a necessity. To provide guidance on the dilemma whether general anesthesia is detrimental, it would be important to understand the mechanisms of injury and whether the worst outcome is related exclusively to hemodynamic changes. Löwhagen Hendén et al. [3] reported their experience in 108 patients, all of whom underwent endovascular treatment using general anesthesia, but those with a fall in the mean arterial blood pressure of >40% was an independent predictor of poor neurological outcome.

We do think that hypotension is deleterious for acute ischemic stroke, importantly, general anesthesia commonly causes hypotension, however; we think is important to be critical to advance the field. The fact that patients with acute ischemic stroke in which the blood pressure is reduced do worse is not novel and has been extensively reported. This notion follows physiological and observational reasoning, however, we should not assume that general anesthesia causes hypotension and that is the sole reason behind a worse outcome. If that is confirmed, efforts should focus on a more careful anesthetic use and/or tighter blood pressure control during anesthesia to avoid its deleterious consequences.

Are we overlooking other effects of general anesthesia besides hypotension? We would like to bring up the idea of other factors to consider in general anesthesia. Studies looking at the cerebral blood flow effects of anesthetics in healthy subjects found cerebral blood flow changes and those were not in association with the decline experienced in the mean arterial blood pressure. Even more, these effects were not always dose-dependent, they differed depending on the anesthetic agent utilized and the cerebral blood flow changes affected unequally different areas of the brain [4].

A second factor to consider is the impairment of cerebral autoregulation present in patients with ischemic stroke. Those areas with impaired autoregulation could be more susceptible to anesthetics, or in a similar mode anesthetics could affect the collateral circulation [5].

While we know hypotension is deleterious in acute stroke, there is a need to proceed with a prospective study to clarify these issues. Is it really hypotension the reason behind general anesthesia that makes stroke patients worse or is there anything else?

References

  1. Jumaa MA, Zhang F, Ruiz-Ares G, Gelzinis T, Malik AM, et al. (2010) Comparison of safety and clinical and radiographic outcomes in endovascular acute stroke therapy for proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion with intubation and general anesthesia versus the nonintubated state. Stroke 41(6): 1180-1184.
  2. Nichols C, Carrozzella J, Yeatts S, Tomsick T, Broderick J, et al. (2010) Is periprocedural sedation during acute stroke therapy associated with poorer functional outcomes? J Neurointerv Surg 2(1): 67-70.
  3. Lowhagen Henden P, Rentzos A, Karlsson JE, Rosengren L, Sundeman H, et al. (2015) Hypotension during endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke is a risk factor for poor neurological outcome. Stroke 46(9): 2678-2680.
  4. Kaisti KK, Metsahonkala L, Teras M, Oikonen V, Aalto S, et al. (2002) Effects of surgical levels of propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia on cerebral blood flow in healthy subjects studied with positron emission tomography. Anesthesiology 96(6): 1358-1370.
  5. Eames PJ, Blake MJ, Dawson SL, Panerai RB, Potter JF (2002) Dynamic cerebral autoregulation and beat to beat blood pressure control are impaired in acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72(4): 467-472.
© 2014-2016 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy