ISSN: 2373-6372GHOA

Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access
Conceptual Paper
Volume 2 Issue 6 - 2015
The Ideal Experimental Training Session for Minimally Invasive Endoluminal Techniques
Sakai P*, Sulbaran M, Sakai C, Bustamante-López L, Leite de Castro V, Ishioka S and Moura E
Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Brazil
Received: October 1, 2015| Published: October 30, 2015
*Corresponding author: Sakai P, Department of Gastroenterology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Dr. Ovídio Pires de Campos, 225 - Cerqueira César - 05403-010, São Paulo – SP, Brasil, Tel: 55 11 999857211; Email:
Citation: Sakai P, Sulbaran M, Sakai C, Bustamante-López L, Leite de Castro V, et al. (2015) The Ideal Experimental Training Session for Minimally Invasive Endoluminal Techniques. Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access 2(6): 00066. DOI: 10.15406/ghoa.2015.02.00066

Introduction

Advanced endoscopy training on Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR), Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) Endoscopic Zenker´s diverticulotomy and Gastrostomy with gastropexy is needed to achieve safe practice in patients. It is important and advisable starting these procedures in a living model as a previous step to the application of these techniques in human cases [1,2].

The in-vivo pig model has proven to be adequate for endoscopic training in the upper digestive tract [3,4]. Anatomy of the pig´s stomach is quite similar to the human anatomy, even though it has a stronger and protruding Pylorus (Torus Pyloricus) [5]. Other important anatomic difference is that every pig has a faringoesophageal diverticulum, which is actually convenient for training of Zenker´s diverticulotomy. Additionally, the pig is the most appropriate animal model for training POEM due to its human anatomic similarity. Pigs have a long esophagus, so are good models for practice to perform the tunnel, and have been widely used to study and train this technique [6-8].

This in-vivo model can be used not only for gastric, but also for esophageal and colonic ESD and EMR training. One of the main limitations of the in-vivo porcine model is the need to clean the colon, which can be a difficult task [9]. However in our experimental unit we have been able to standardize adequate colonic preparation with 1250 ml of mannitol solution 20% 24 hours before the training session. Any material which might be eaten by the pigs should be removed from the floor in the animal laboratory. An additional advantage of colonic preparation is that it diminishes the presence of residual ingested materials in the stomach as well, therefore improving quality of training on gastric procedures.

An important advantage of the in-vivo model, as compared to the ex-vivo is that the former is more realistic, with preserved peristalsis, intraluminal secretions, and with possibility of bleeding or perforation as potential complications. Treatment of complications becomes part of the endoscopic training. In our unit coag-grasper is used in case of bleeding, and hemo-clips are applied for treatment of microperforations. Moreover, this model offers the possibility to assess the post-treatment evolution of the animals in survival studies.

To our knowledge, the in-vivo pig model has not been proposed as a tool to achieve advanced training on multiple procedures during the same training session. Several studies have described the usefulness of the in-vivo pig model for specific procedures, mainly gastric, esophageal or colorectal ESD, POEM or Zenker’s diverticulotomy [10-13]. Additionally, short experimental courses mainly focus on developing skills to a specific technique in a particular organ of the animal. This may lead to a lower number of undertaken procedures in other organs, and probably could account for a suboptimal management of the cost of having available experimental animals.

The veterinarian support is key for achieving well conducted training with controlled sedation and adequate pain management for animals. The ethics committee of our institution has approved every performed study, following the standard principles for animal experimentation. The veterinarians are responsible for euthanasia of animals, and closely follow them for signs of complications in survival studies.

One of the major limitations in training of these advanced techniques is the lack of experimental centers with experienced endoscopists who can provide appropriate supervision. There are few training centers around the world in which an endoscopy fellow can be trained on these techniques [10]. We offer our residents a weekly exposure to experimental training under strict supervision of an experienced endoscopist (P.S) and we believe that standardization of the ideal experimental training session in important in order to maximize the results of our efforts.

While it is clear that skills acquisition improves with experience, the minimum number of procedures to achieve competence has not clearly been defined [14]. The process of skills acquisition has been described as a sequential process. Different sources of workload have been described during this process, and are captured in a workload assessment tool known as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index. This subjective assessment of workload has been tested in several domains, including medicine, and have recently been adapted and validated as an Endoscopy Task load Index that can be easily applied to several endoscopic procedures [15]. We have demonstrated its applicability for colorectal ESD training, concluding that mental and physical demand diminish at the end of the training period [16]. This valuable tool could be further applied to other endoscopic procedures in order to provide a better definition of the transition point between the intermediate and the fully automated phases of expertise development.

Besides training on standard endoscopic techniques, the in-vivo pig model also offers the opportunity for advancing the frontiers of minimally invasive surgery, where no precise limit divides the surgical and the endoscopic fields, and rather fusion them for the future advancement of care for our patients. We have recently created an endoscopically assisted colostomy technique that may serve as a bridge for surgical treatment for patients with partially obstructive rectal cancer [17] and an endoscopic rectopexy technique for treatment of procidentia as an alternative to laparocopic surgery in patients that are not well fitted for surgery. Moreover we have not stopped at this frontier and continue working in the development of new devices for pexies in the gastrointestinal tract that can facilitate gastric tubes placement in selected patients.

Conclusion

In summary, the porcine model is a very efficient training in-vivo system for advanced endoscopic procedures that allow us to reproduce and treat potential complications in a controlled and safe environment. Training on gastric and colorectal ESD, colorectal mucosectomy, POEM and Zenker diverticulotomy can be achieved during a single training session. Optimization of the training session provides an excellent opportunity for residents and trainees, maximizing the benefit of the cost of the animal and the opportunity of achieving supervised training by an experienced endoscopist. Moreover, development of new minimally invasive techniques and devices can be safely tested before application in humans as we continue to expand the endoscopy clinical frontiers.

References

  1. Parra-Blanco A, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Antillon MR, Deprez PH et al. (2011) Tu1469 Recommendations about training for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the Western world: results of a survey to experts. Gastrointest Endosc 73(4): AB419-AB420.
  2. Deprez PH, Bergman JJ, Meisner S, Ponchon T, Repici A, et al. (2010) Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy 42(10): 853-858.
  3. Kaltenbach T, Soetikno, R Kusano C, Gotoda T (2011) Development of expertise in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 13(1): 100-104.
  4. Parra-Blanco A, Arnau MR, Nicolás-Pérez D, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Gonzalez N, et al. (2010) Endoscopic submucosal dissection training with pig models in a Western country. World J Gastroenterol 16(23): 2895-2900.
  5. Freys SM, Heimbucher J, Fuchs KH (1995) Teaching upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: the pig stomach. Endoscopy 27(1): 73-76.
  6. Hong SJ (2013) Peroral endoscopic myotomy in a porcine model: a step to achalasia patients. Clin Endosc 46(1): 1-2.
  7. Eleftheriadis N, Inoue H, Ikeda H, Onimaru M, Yoshida A, et al. (2012) Training in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Ther Clin Risk Manag 8: 329-342.
  8. Bang BW, Choi YC, Kim HG, Known KS, Shin YW, et al. (2013) Peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia in an animal model: a feasibility study. Clin Endosc 46(1): 54-58.
  9. Parra-Blanco A, Gonzalez N, Arnau MR (2012) Ex vivo and in vivo models for endoscopic submucosal dissection training. Clin Endosc 45(4): 350-357.
  10. Tanimoto MA, Guerrero ML, Morita Y, Aquiree-VAladez J, Gomez E, et al. (2015) Impact of formal training in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastrointestinal cancer: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7(4): 417-28.
  11. Takizawa K, Knipschield MA, Gostout CJ (2013) Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal resection (SEMR): a new hybrid technique of endoscopic submucosal balloon dissection in the porcine rectosigmoid colon. Surg Endosc 27(12): 4457-4462.
  12. González N, Parra-Blanco A, Villa-Gómez M, Gamba A, Taullard A, et al. (2013) Gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: from animal model to patient. World J Gastroenterol 19(45): 8326-8334.
  13. Gostout CJ, Knipschield MA (2012) Submucosal endoscopy with mucosal resection: a hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection in the porcine rectum and distal colon. Gastrointest Endosc 76(4): 829-834.
  14. Parra-Blanco A, González N, González R, Ortiz-Fernández-Sordo J, Ordieres C (2013) Animal models for endoscopic training: do we really need them? Endoscopy 45(6): 478-484.
  15. Mohamed R, Raman M, Anderson J, McLaughlin K, Rostom A, et al. (2014) Validation of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index as a tool to evaluate the learning curve for endoscopy training. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 28(3): 155-159.
  16. Leite de Castro V (2014) Treinamento experimental de dissecção endoscópica submucosa (ESD) colorectal. GED Gastroenterol Endosc Dig 33(Supl.1): 29-581.
  17. Bustamante-Lopez, Sulbaran M, Sakai P, Eduardo Moura, Cristiano Sakai, et al. (2014) Endoscopic assisted colostomy with percutaneous colopexy: an experimental study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 58(5): e208-e209.
© 2014-2016 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy