Journal of ISSN: 2373-4396JCCR

Cardiology & Current Research
Research Article
Volume 5 Issue 4 - 2016
Correlation between Pre-Systolic Forward Flow and Diastolic Function
Sami Nimer Ghazal¹* and Jawaher Towhari²
¹Internal Medicine Department, College of Medicine, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia
²College of Cardiac Technology, University of Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Received: March 20, 2016 | Published: April 20, 2016
*Corresponding author: Sami Nimer Ghazal, Cardiology division, Internal Medicine department, King Fahd Hospital of the University, University of Dammam, Al-Khobar 31952, Saudi Arabia, Email:
Citation: Ghazal SN, Towhari J (2016) Correlation between Pre-Systolic Forward Flow and Diastolic Function. J Cardiol Curr Res 5(4): 00172. DOI:10.15406/jccr.2016.05.00172


Background: Left ventricular out flow tract (LVOT) pre-systolic forward flow by spectral Doppler is an interesting phenomenon (figure1). However, its significance is not well defined. Our study aims to examine echo characteristics of subjects with positive PSW and correlation between PSW velocity and diastolic parameters.

Methods: We conducted a prospective study recruiting 91 subjects with positive pre-systolic forward flow by pulsed wave Doppler. Correlation coefficient utilizing Pearson method was conducted between pre-systolic wave velocity and left atrial (LA) volume index, E wave deceleration time, average e’ velocity (septal and lateral).

Result: No significant correlation was found.

Conclusion: Pre-systolic wave is found in many normal subjects and is explained by the left ventricular fluid mechanics of ring of vortex model.

Keywords: Pre-systolic wave; Diastolic function; Diastolic flow; Echocardiography; left ventricular; Ejection fraction; Adverse; Cardiac


LVOT: Left Ventricular Outflow Tract; PSW: Pre-Systolic Wave; PW: Pulsed Wave; MACE: Major Adverse Cardiac Events; LVEDP: Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure; EF: Ejection Fraction


Left ventricular out flow tract (LVOT) pre-systolic forward flow by spectral Doppler is an interesting phenomenon (Figure 1). However, its significance is not well defined. It was classically suggested to be caused by stiff ventricle and elevated left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) as atrial contraction will further increase the pressure in the left ventricle causing early premature forward flow across the aortic valve. However, that was not proved.

Figure 1: Pulsed wave spectral Doppler showing pre-systolic forward flow(asterisks).

In 1990 Panaviotou & Byrd [1] studied this phenomenon in 59 patients and concluded that pre-systolic forward flow is a normal phenomenon found in the majority of normal subjects and suggested that the fluid mechanics of left ventricular outflow as a ring vortex is the responsible mechanism [1]. Moreover, it was found in another more recent study that absence of pre-systolic wave (PSW) was associated with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and increased major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [2].

Our study aims to examine echo characteristics of subjects with PSWand the correlation between PSW velocity and parameters of diastolic function and LVEDP, namely left atrial (LA) volume index, E wave deceleration time, average e’ velocity(septal and lateral) and E/e’ ratio.

Material and Methods

We prospectively studied 91consecutivepatients undergoing routine transthoracic echocardiography acquired at our institute starting on May 11, 2015 till July 7, 2015. Only patients with technically good quality studies were included. Inclusion criterion is the presence of LVOT diastolic forward flow by pulsed wave (PW) Doppler in apical 5 or 3 chamber views.

Exclusion criteria were

  1. Presence of moderate or more mitral stenosis.
  2. Presence of moderate or more mitral regurgitation;
  3. Significant mitral annular calcification;
  4. Patient with incomplete echo cardio graphic data.

Blood pressure was recorded for all patients just prior to the transthoracic echocardiographic examination. Left atrial volume was measured utilizing biplane method of disks and indexed to the body surface area. Doppler echocardiographic measurements were performed according to The European Association of Echocardiography/American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for the evaluation of diastolic function [3]. Mitral annular velocities were obtained from PW tissue Doppler imaging performed in the apical 4 chamber views. Septal e’velocity and lateral e’velocities were measured. Accordingly, septal, lateral and average E/e’ ratios were calculated. PW Doppler of the LVOT was obtained by placing the PW sample volume in the LVOT, approximately 1 cm from the aortic valve. Peak velocity of PSW was measured. Mitral E wave peak velocity and deceleration time were obtained from pulse wave Doppler in the apical 4-chamber view at the tip of mitral valve leaflets. Correlation test was performed utilizing Pearson correlation coefficient between PSW velocity and left atrial volume index, E wave deceleration time, average e’ velocity and average E/e’ ratio.


91 patients with PSW by PW Doppler were recruited. Baseline characteristics (Table 1) showed mean age of 56.9 years. All patients were in normal sinus rhythm with mean heart rate of 74 bpm. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 137 mmHg and 78 mmHg respectively. Mean indexed left atrial volume was 33ml/m². Mean velocity of the PSW is 43cm/s and 14 (15%) patients of them had high E/e’ ratio defined as average E/e’ more than 13. Correlation coefficients is represented as (r) in table 2.



Mean age (years) ± SD

56 ± 15

Mean systolic Blood Pressure ± SD

138 ± 21

Mean diastolic Blood Pressure ± SD

80 ± 11

Mean heart Rate (bpm) ± SD

75 ± 14

Mean LA volume index (ml/m2) ± SD

32 ± 13

Mean E wave deceleration time (m sec )

206 ± 64

Mean e’ septal velocity (cm/sec) ± SD

8 ± 3

Mean e’ lateral velocity (cm/sec) ± SD

9 ± 4

Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of patient with positive presystolic wave by PW.

Figure 2:Scatterplot showing no significant correlation between pre-systolic forward flow velocity and average E/e’ (A), E wave deceleration time (B), average mitral annular velocity (C) and LA volume index (D).


 Correlation Coefficient (r)


Average E/e’



E wave deceleration time



Average e’



LA volume index



Table 2: Correlation of pre-systolic forward flow velocity by pulsed wave Doppler.


E/e’ ratio is a validated and reproducible method of estimation of LV filling pressure. E/e’ > 15 associated with left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP)> 20mmHg [4]. LA volume is another sensitive marker of elevated LVEDP [5]. E wave deceleration time and mitral annular velocities are among the most important recommended parameters of to evaluate for diastolic function estimation [3]. We studied the correlation between PSW magnitude (velocity) and fore mentioned variables of diastolic function and LVEDP and we did not find any significant correlation (Figure 2). Therefore, it became clear that presence of PSW is not related to the compliance and diastolic function of the left ventriclenor to LVEDP. PSW is more or less a normal phenomenon.

Figure 3:LV fluid mechanics as a ring vortex model.

The fluid mechanics of LV filling were extensively studied and found to simulate a ring vortex model [6] (Figure 3). Our findings of no significant correlation between PSW and diastolic parameters does not contradict the explanation of ring vortex fluid mechanics being the responsible cause forPSW, instead, we further support this explanation. The association between absence of PSW and increased MACE is due todisrupted fluid mechanics in dilated and failing heart.


PSW is found in many normal subjects and is a normal phenomenon. Fluid mechanics of ring vortex is an acceptable explanation of the mechanism of PSW. No significant correlation was found between magnitude of PSW and diastolic function. Absence of PSW was found to be more prevalent in reduced EF patient and thus was associated with increased MACE.


  1. Panaviotou H, Byrd BF (1990) Origin and significance of diastolic Doppler flow signal in the Left ventricular outflow tract. J Am Coll Cardiol 16(7): 1625-1631.
  2. Joshi KR, Kabirdas D, Romero CA, Shah M, Figueredo VM, et al. (2014) Clinical Significance of a Presystolic Wave. Am J Cardiol  114(10): 1599-1602.
  3. Nagueh S, Appleton C, Gillebert T, Marino PN, Oh JK, et al. (2009) Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(2): 107-133.
  4. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Miller FA, Oh JK, et al. (2000) Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: A comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 102(15): 1788-1794.
  5. Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB (2002) Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol 90(12): 1284-1289.
  6. Bellhouse BJ (1972) Fluid mechanics of a model mitral valve and left ventricle. Cardiovasc Res 6(2): 199-210.
© 2014-2018 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy