MOJ ISSN: 2374-6920MOJPB

Proteomics & Bioinformatics
Editorial
Volume 3 Issue 4 - 2016
Repurposing Drugs in the Genomics Era: Bioinformatics Approaches
Ramaswamy Narayanan*
Department of Biological Sciences, Charles E Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, USA
Received: May 02, 2016 | Published: May 03, 2016
*Corresponding author: Ramaswamy Narayanan, Department of Biological Sciences, Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Road, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA, Tel: +1-561-297-2247; Fax: +1-561-297-3859; Email:
Citation: Narayanan R (2016) Repurposing Drugs in the Genomics Era: Bioinformatics Approaches. MOJ Proteomics Bioinform 3(4): 00092. DOI: 10.15406/mojpb.2016.03.00092

Abbreviations

DNI: Drugs of New Indications; FDA: Federal Drug Administration; GWAS: Genome-Wide Association Studies; PheGenI: Phenome-Genome Integrator

Editorial

Conventional drug discovery approaches is time consuming with a high failure rate [1]. In recent years discovering new uses for already approved drugs is becoming increasingly attractive [2-5]. This approach, termed as “drug repurposing” offers several advantages. For an approved drug, considerable information such as molecular targets, pathways, dosage, formulation, side effects, pharmacology and toxicology is available. This can considerably shorten the clinical trials and the approval process for a new indication. For diseases with limited options such as pancreatic cancer or for the neglected diseases involving various infectious diseases, such an approach would provide a rationale for therapy in the short run [6,7].

The era of repurposed medicine started with the success of Pfizer in 1998 when Sildenafil (Viagra) was repurposed from angina to erectile dysfunction [8]. The anti nausea drug, Thalidomide (Thalomid) was repurposed for the treatment of leprosy in 1998 [9] and multiple myeloma in 2006 by Celgene [10]. The list of repurposed drugs for the treatment of diverse diseases continues to evolve [11]. A drug target is often implicated in multiple pathways. These pathways are frequently shared across diverse cell types and consequently in multiple disease phenotypes. Thus, it is reasonable to expect an approved drug for one disease indication may offer therapeutic advantage in other diseases. Often a hint of repurposing use for a drug stems from epidemiological studies and clinical practice. Bioinformatics approaches can be used effectively to develop a database of repurposed drugs [12,13].

Mining of the genome- and –knowledge oriented databases is an attractive starting point for drug targets discovery. The availability of genome databases such as the NCBI Phenome-Genome Integrator, PheGenI [14], the Genome-wide Association Studies Catalogue, GWAS [15], human protein atlas [16], human protein map [17], proteomics dB [18] the Uniprot knowledgebase [19] and canSar protein annotation tool [20] can facilitate a systematic characterization of drug targets. The implication of a drug target in multiple diseases can be inferred from disease-oriented databases such as the GeneCards [21], the MalaCards [22], and the DisGeNet [23]. Molecular targets for approved drugs can be inferred from the drug bank [24], US Federal Drug Administration database (FDA) and Drugs of New Indications (DNI) database [13].

Using such an approach, recently series of FDA approved drugs were predicted for possible repurposing in the treatment of Vitiligo, an autoimmune disease [25], Ebola Virus disease [26,27] and the Zika virus infection [28]. The drug classes included antidiabetics, anti estrogens, antineoplastics, antithrombotics, antivirals, antihypertensives, statins as well as nutraceuticals. These results provide a strong rationale for therapeutic validation for repurposing efforts for these infectious diseases. For diseases such as the Ebola virus disease and the Zika virus disease with global implications, such a repurposing of existing drugs could help meet the urgent needs.

Commercialization challenges including patent protection, competition from the generics and pricing of an existing drug for new indication exist to the concept of repurposing medicine [29]. Nevertheless, for diseases with limited treatment options, neglected diseases and global healthcare emergencies, repurposing existing drugs is a necessary approach for urgently needed therapeutics. Systematic bioinformatics mining of the genome can help improve the odds of finding the right drug with the molecular target implicated in specific diseases. Repurposing medicine together with conventional drug discovery approaches can help move the discoveries closer to bedside at a faster rate and meet unmet demands. One can anticipate that repurposing becomes a standard drug discovery approach in the future.

References

  1. DiMasi JA, Feldman L, Seckler A, Wilson A (2010) Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 87(3): 272-277.
  2. Mullard A (2012) Drug repurposing programmes get lift off. Nat Rev Drug Discov 11(7): 505-506.
  3. Pantziarka P, Bouche G, Meheus L, Sukhatme V, Sukhatme VP, et al. (2014) The Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO) Project. Ecancermedicalscience 8: 442.
  4. Turner N, Zeng XY, Osborne B, Rogers S, Ye JM (2016) Repurposing Drugs to Target the Diabetes Epidemic. Trends Pharmacol Sci 37(5): 379-389.
  5. Chong CR, Sullivan DJ, Jr (2007) New uses for old drugs. Nature 448(7154): 645-646.
  6. Robertson SA, Renslo AR (2011) Drug discovery for neglected tropical diseases at the Sandler Center. Future Med Chem 3(10): 1279-1288.
  7. Pantziarka P, Bouche G, Meheus L, Sukhatme V, Sukhatme VP (2014) Repurposing drugs in oncology (ReDO)-cimetidine as an anti-cancer agent. Ecancermedicalscience 8: 485.
  8. Ghofrani HA, Osterloh IH, Grimminger F (2006) Sildenafil: from angina to erectile dysfunction to pulmonary hypertension and beyond. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5(8): 689-702.
  9. Silverman WA (2002) The schizophrenic career of a "monster drug". Pediatrics 110(2 Pt 1): 404-406.
  10. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, et al. (1999) Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 341(21): 1565-1571.
  11. Boichuk S, Lee DJ, Mehalek KR, Makielski KR, Wozniak A, et al. (2014) Unbiased compound screening identifies unexpected drug sensitivities and novel treatment options for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer research 74(4): 1200-1213.
  12. Dakshanamurthy S, Issa NT, Assefnia S, Seshasayee A, Peters OJ, et al. (2012) Predicting new indications for approved drugs using a proteochemometric method. J Med Chem 55(15): 6832-6848.
  13. Liu Z, Fang H, Reagan K, Xu X, Mendrick DL, et al. (2013) In silico drug repositioning: what we need to know. Drug Discov Today 18(3-4): 110-115.
  14. Ramos EM, Hoffman D, Junkins HA, Maglott D, Phan L, et al. (2014) Phenotype-Genotype Integrator (PheGenI): synthesizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data with existing genomic resources. Eur J Hum Genet 22(1): 144-147.
  15. Welter D, MacArthur J, Morales J, Burdett T, Hall P, et al. (2014) The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res 42(Database issue): D1001-D1006.
  16. Uhlen M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Jonasson K, et al. (2010) Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas. Nat Biotechnol 28(12): 1248-1250.
  17. Kim MS, Pinto SM, Getnet D, Nirujogi RS, Manda SS, et al. (2014) A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 509(7502): 575-581.
  18. Wilhelm M, Schlegl J, Hahne H, Moghaddas Gholami A, et al. (2014) Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 509(7502): 582-587.
  19. Magrane M, Consortium U (2011) UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data. Database 10.1093/database/bar009.
  20. Tym JE, Mitsopoulos C, Coker EA, Razaz P, Schierz AC, et al. (2016) canSAR: an updated cancer research and drug discovery knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1): D938-D943.
  21. Safran M, Dalah I, Alexander J, Rosen N, Iny Stein T, et al. (2010) GeneCards Version 3: the human gene integrator. Database (Oxford). 10.1093/database/baq020.
  22. Rappaport N, Twik M, Nativ N, Stelzer G, Bahir I, et al.(2014) MalaCards: A Comprehensive Automatically-Mined Database of Human Diseases. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 47: 1-19.
  23. Pinero J, Queralt-Rosinach N, Bravo A, Deu-Pons J, Bauer-Mehren A, et al. (2015) DisGeNET: a discovery platform for the dynamical exploration of human diseases and their genes. Database 2015: bav028.
  24. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Shrivastava S, Hassanali M, et al. (2006) DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration. Nucleic acids research 34(Database issue): D668-672.
  25. Narayanan R (2015) Druggable Vitiligo Genome: A Fast Track Approach to Take the Genome Wide Association to the Clinic. MOJ Proteomics Bioinform 3(2): 50-62.
  26. Narayanan R (2014) Ebola-associated genes in the human genome: Implications for novel targets. MOJ Proteomics Bioinform 1(5): 0032.
  27. Kouznetsova J, Sun W, Martinez-Romero C, Tawa G, Shinn P, et al. (2014) Identification of 53 compounds that block Ebola virus-like particle entry via a repurposing screen of approved drugs. Emerg Microbes Infect 3: e84.
  28. Narayanan R (2016) Zeka virus Therapeutics: Drug Targets and Repurposing Medicine from the Human Genome. MOJ Proteomics Bioinform 3(3): 84-90.
  29. Kato S, Moulder SL, Ueno NT, Wheler JJ, Meric-Bernstam F, et al. (2015) Challenges and perspective of drug repurposing strategies in early phase clinical trials. Oncoscience 2(6): 576-580.
© 2014-2016 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy