ISSN: 2373-6367PPIJ

Pharmacy & Pharmacology International Journal
Editorial
Volume 4 Issue 3 - 2016
Strategies to Improve Student Learning of Pharmacology in Pharmacy Curriculum
Arjun Dutta*
Senior Associate Dean & Professor, Marshall B. Ketchum University, USA
Received:May 03, 2016 | Published: May 09, 2016
*Corresponding author: Arjun Dutta, Senior Associate Dean & Professor, College of Pharmacy, Marshall B. Ketchum University, Fullerton, CA 92831, USA, Tel: 714-872-5693; Fax: 714-872-5706, Email: ,
Citation: Dutta A (2016) Strategies to Improve Student Learning of Pharmacology in Pharmacy Curriculum. Pharm Pharmacol Int J 4(3): 00076. DOI: 10.15406/ppij.2016.04.00076

Introduction

Pharmacology and Toxicology provide the core knowledge for mechanisms of drug action and toxicity to pharmacy students [1]. As such, a good foundation in these elemental courses is necessary to the understanding of the therapeutics courses. This seems all the more important, given the fact that students are expected to solve case based scenarios for the North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination (NAPLEX) [2]. The pharmacy education literature has suggested several strategies on improving student learning and retention of pharmacology in the curriculum. The following are a synopsis of some of the strategies documented by researchers that have shown improvement of student comprehension of complex pharmacological principles.

Use of Primers

It is a known fact that pharmacy school curriculum [1] entails the delivery of large amount of information, in a pretty short period of time (2-3 years of didactic). Professors have to constantly balance the need to provide the most necessary information within the time constraints of the course. One of the strategies mentioned in the literature is the use of Primers to allow freshly admitted P1 students to brush up on their pre-pharmacy knowledge. The primers typically consist of material that will be applicable in the first year of didactic education. The material provided ranges from medical terminology [3], fundamentals in organic chemistry (functional groups), principles of calculations, and other idiomatic material unique to the pharmacy program. While anecdotal evidence exists highlighting the benefits of such primers, there is not much by way of statistical evidence.

Integrating the Curriculum

Beleh et al. [4] have summarized the reasons and advantages of integrating the biomedical and pharmaceutical sciences. The predominant advantage lies in better understanding of the concepts and retention by students. Pharmacology and medicinal chemistry are two such courses that lend it well in terms of integrating the information. Moreover, the information in these two areas is the precursors for the therapeutic courses for pharmacy students. Thus it seems logical to integrate these courses and if possible, run them concurrently with the therapeutic courses. This integration is often done by body systems to provide continuity and a reference point for students.

Use of Online Tools, Strategies, and Games to Improve Retention

Student engagement and interest are often the necessary attributes to successful learning of the material. While most courses attempt to engage students, it is a difficult task given the complexity of the material and time available. In a study by Karaksha et al. [5] it was found that providing online teaching and learning resources effectively increased student engagement. In a similar study, an educational board game was found to increase student learning of the autonomic nervous system pharmacology [6]. Other strategies include using NIH grant applications, case based instruction, crossword puzzles, 3-D virtual environment, and online active learning modules [7-11].

While the process of learning is very intrinsic and unique to an individual, the research certainly bears out the advantages of employing strategies that can enhance the learning process for students.

References

  1. https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf
  2. http://www.nabp.net/programs/examination/naplex
  3. Boschmans S, Webb P (2014) Evaluating the Relationship between General Health Vocabulary and Student Achievement in Pharmacology. AJPE 78(6): 2014.  
  4. Beleh M, Engels M, Garcia G (2015) Integrating a New medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacology Course Sequence into the PharmD Curriculum. AJPE 79(1): 2015.
  5. Karaksha A, Grant G, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Nirthanan S, Davey A (2013) Student Engagement in Pharmacology Courses Using Online Learning Tools. Am J Pharm Educ 77(6): 125.
  6. Jones S, Tincher L, Odeng-Out E, Herdman M (2013) An Educational Board Game to Assist Students in learning Autonomic Nervous System Pharmacology. Am J Pharm Educ 77(6): 2013.
  7. Leak R, O’ Donnell L, Surratt C (2015) Teaching Pharmacology Graduate Students how to Write an NIH Grant Application. Am J Pharm Educ 79(9): 2015.
  8. Brown S, Brooks P, Creekmore KA (2011) Case-Based Toxicology Elective Course to Enhance Student Learning in Pharmacotherapy. Am J Pharm Educ 75(6): 118.
  9. Shah S, Lynch L, Macias-Moriarty L (2010) Crossword Puzzles as a Tool to Enhance Learning About Anti-Ulcer Agents. Am J Pharm Educ 74(7): 117.
  10. Richardson A, Bracegirdle L, Mc Lachlan S, Chapman S (2013) Use of a Three-Dimensional Virtual Environment to Teach Drug-Receptor Interactions. Am J Pharm Educ 77(1): 11.
  11. Skau AK (2004) Teaching Pharmacodynamics: An Introductory Module on Learning Dose-Response Relationships. Am J Pharm Educ 68(3): 2004.
© 2014-2016 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy