Journal of JABB

Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering
Research Article
Volume 1 Issue 1 - 2016
Application of Red-Sand/Chitosan Hybrid Filtration System for Phosphate Removal from Agricultural Wastewater
Terence Yep1, Michael Saunders2, Craig Merkley3, Darryl Finnigan4 and Bulent Mutus1*
1Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Windsor, Canada
2Holland Marsh Grower’s Association (HMGA), Canada
3Upper Thames River Conservation Authority (UTRCA), Canada
4Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food & Rural Affairs (OMAFRA), Canada
Received: September 04, 2016| Published: October 05, 2016
*Corresponding author: Bulent Mutus, Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Ave, Canada, Tel: 519253-3000 x 3526; Email:
Citation: Yep T, Saunders M, Merkley C, Finnigan D, Mutus B (2016) Application of Red-Sand/Chitosan Hybrid Filtration System for Phosphate Removal from Agricultural Wastewater. J Appl Biotechnol Bioeng 1(1): 00005. DOI: 10.15406/jabb.2016.01.00005

Abstract

Point sources of phosphate used in this study were from a livestock transport truckwash station, and a vegetable wash operation. Two types of red sand/chitosan hybrid filtration systems were used:

  1. Wastewater from settling ponds were introduced to a red sand (actual term) bed (10 ft x 20 ft x 3ft) and water percolating to the surface of red sand was introduced to iron-chitosan filtration unit.
  2. Second filtration setup consisted of two 55 gallon (208 litres) the first containing ~18 L of red-sand and the eluate from which entered a second barrel containing iron-chitosan (3 kg) suspension. With the red sand bed-chitosan system, the red sand component lowered phosphate levels from ~19 µg/ml (inflow from pond) by 6 fold (~3 µg/ml). The chitosan filter unit further reduced it to ~0.04 to 1.5 µg/ml with flow rates of ~3.5 L/min. At the vegetable wash station, a variant of the system setup that utilized double barrel hybrid filtration system was used. In this application, the pre-filter attenuated soluble phosphate levels from ~14 µg/ml (inflow from washes) by ~30 fold (~0.5 µg/ml) and the chitosan filter unit reduced it further ~0.2-0.4 µg/ml with flow rates ~3.5 L/min for every wash cycle. The red-sand/chitosan hybrid system presents a portable and cost effective means for reducing suspended solids and soluble phosphates from agricultural wastewater effluents. This system also provides a potential solution for recycling unused phosphates.

Keywords: Chitosan; Red sand; Filtration; wastewater; Phosphates; Ion Exchange

Introduction

The accumulation of phosphates and nitrates in wastewater derived from various sources including, agricultural processes and livestock farming, is eventually discharged into oceans, lakes and rivers. A most common reason for this is usually due to a lack of infrastructure or cost aversion. This leads to algal blooms, and eventually to eutrophication, adversely affecting water quality and eco-systems.

In recent years, several techniques have been employed for the treatment of phosphates which includes chemical precipitation, biological treatment, as well as ion exchange [1-7]. The currently employed techniques are very effective at attenuating phosphates from wastewater effluents however, they require a significant investment of capital and space [8,9]. Constructing wetlands [10] and reed beds [11] were some alternative techniques employed for the treatment of phosphates which are relatively cheaper, when it is compared to conventional strategies. Ion exchange is an alternative option for wastewater treatment due its capacity to sorb ions of interest which can be desorbed at a later stage for applications in other aspects such as manure production [12]. Common ion exchangers include zeolites [13] and synthetic polymers [14] that contain modified functional groups to remove positively or negatively charged ions depending on the nature of the functional group. Chitosan, a biopolymer obtained by the deacetylation of chitin. It has applications in ion exchange due to its ability to selectively sorb transition metal ions [15]. Chitosan is structurally similar to cellulose except that it has primary amines present at the C-2 position [16]. This hetero-polymer’s amines and hydroxyl groups present on the polymer participate in the formation of dative bonds with transition metal ions [16-19]. Chitosan had mostly been used as a coagulant in wastewater treatment applications however, metal-complexed chitosan has been shown to act as an ion exchange medium for anionic contaminants like phosphates, and research on its application in wastewater treatment is currently underway [20-22]. Sand based filtration systems have been used for the tertiary treatment of water [23] and are usually used to remove organic matter and suspended solids from influent wastewater streams. This type filtration system has also been used in conjunction with UV irradiation in order to treat wastewater effluents to produce potable water [24]. Red sand is a mixture of sand and red sandstone which is rich in hydrated iron oxide which is responsible for its red color. It is commonly found in areas containing red sandstone.

The present study is aimed at studying the effectiveness of a hybrid sand/chitosan filtration system for treating wastewater from agricultural sources that is focused on attenuating soluble phosphate content as well as suspended solids in the filtrate.

Materials and Methods

Ascorbic acid (Sigma), Ammonium molybdate tetrahydrate (Sigma), Chitosan flakes (Dungeness environmental), Dipotassium phosphate (Fisher Scientific), Iron-complexed chitosan flakes (Chemfil Canada Ltd), Malachite Green Carbinol hydrochloride (Sigma), Iron (II) sulfate (Sigma), Polyvinyl alcohol (Sigma), Red sand (Hutcheson Sand & Gravel), Sulfuric acid (Sigma), Whatman filter paper (Fisher).

Preparation of iron-complexed chitosan flakes

Chitosan (DOD% 85) was mixed with 0.1M iron sulfate solution. The flakes were mixed at 350rpm in the iron sulfate solution incubated for 3 hours after which, the flakes, were washed with distilled H2O, three times,10X chitosan volume, were dried in an oven at 50°C for 3 hours.

Study sites and experimental design

Filtration apparatus was tested at a livestock transport truckwash station located in Sebringville, Ontario and a vegetable wash station located in Ansnorveldt, Ontario. Locations were chosen by local conservation authorities based on the urgency for phosphate treatment as both sites exhibited a high concentration of phosphate and suspended solids content (figure 1).

Figure 1: a) Schematics for the new chitosan filter unit prototype setup are similar to that of a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The unit is equipped with a motor attached to a 3 ft. paint mixer (A) with paddles 8.5 cm wide. The water source was passively passed through (B) red sand. A well was manually dug out in order to make a crude well and with the help of a pump, the water was drawn into the reactor. The water level was controlled with the help of solenoid sensors and valves (C). The filtration unit’s electronics were connected to portable process control system (PCS) which controlled the pump as well as the solenoid valves for intake of wastewater and release of treated effluent. The filter unit was used a 55 gallon water storage barrel equipped with a 0.5 mm mesh filter (D) that would prevents the iron chitosan from leaving the filtration unit. Filtration unit was powered by a 12 V battery power source and was recharged using a solar panel (E). b) Second filtration unit was designed to allow the post-sand filtrate to gravitationally enter the chitosan filter unit. The wastewater is pumped with the help of a sump-pump into pre-filter unit containing red sand (B), the sand is separated from the filtrate by a fine metallic mesh (C). The post-sand filtrate is then transferred to the chitosan filter unit where it is stirred continuously with the help of a motorized stirrer (A) and the effluent is passed through a metallic mesh (D).

Sampling

Wastewater samples were dependent on the wash cycles at both locations. The “initial” readings were taken during the beginning of every wash cycle. Wastewater was grab sampled from the artificial wetlands constructed at both sites as well as from the post treatment effluent at 8 hour intervals over 3 weeks. The samples (50 mL) were then acidified with sulfuric acid and stored in polyethylene bottles, which were transported in iced cooler boxes. Samples were analyzed within 24 hours of collection.

Chemical methods

  1. Water samples were analyzed using standard methods. Colorimetric techniques were used to determine total phosphate content (molybdenum blue method & malachite green phosphate assay). Total suspended solids were quantified by weighing the dry weight of particles trapped after filtration (Whatman filter paper).
  2. Red sand samples were homogenized using mortar and pestle. The samples were then loaded into the XRD machine (Rigaku Miniflex+). The X-ray tube used is a Copper-Kα tube with a wavelength of 1.541 Å. The tube voltage is 30kV and the tube current is 15mA. The samples are analyzed at a rate of 1 degree/minute with a sampling rate of every 0.1 degree.

Results and Discussion

Phosphate desorption studies for iron-complexed chitosan and red sand

Saturating chitosan flakes with metals significantly improved its phosphate sorption capacity. In these field tests, chitosan was saturated with iron and its phosphate binding capacity based on desorption studies are shown in Table 1. In addition to this, it was observed (Table 1) that red sand was not a very effective adsorbent for phosphates. The adsorption of phosphates could be due to the presence of aluminosilicates in the mixture, which are usually the main components of zeolite matrices.

Filter

Phosphate Recovered (mM)

Phosphates recovered (mg/g Chitosan)

Native chitosan flakes

5.59 ± 0.57

10.84 ± 1.07

Iron-complexed chitosan flakes

8.79 ± 0.23

17.05 ± 0.44

Red sand

0.11 ± 0.01

0.28 ± 0.02

Table 1: Comparison of chitosan flakes with iron chitosan flakes and ‘red sand’ indicates the adsorption capacity of iron-complexed chitosan is higher than the other filters being used for water treatment. All experiments were performed in triplicates and values are the average concentration of phosphate from 3 separate experiments. The error bars represent standard error (n=3).

Truckwash station

The hybrid red-sand/chitosan filtration system was first applied at this site, and during the sampling periods May-July 2015, the filtration system had demonstrated its effectiveness in attenuating a significant amount of phosphates from the truck wash effluents shown in Figure 2a and 2b. The pre-filter, red sand effectively removed ~99% of TSS from wastewater in the effluent as shown in Fig. 5 and along with reducing the soluble phosphates from the settling pond by about 6–30 fold (~500 µg/L) prior to the introduction into the chitosan filtration unit. This suggested that the red sand pre-filter was either adsorbing or precipitating all the soluble phosphates after the effluent had passed through it. Subsequently, the chitosan filtration unit was able to lower it further to ~200 µg/L.

Figure 2: Phosphate concentration for samples (50 ml) that were taken from the settling pond were drastically lower in value compared to post-red sand effluents. The “pond” indicates the average soluble phosphate concentration from the wastewater source and “inflow” indicates the soluble phosphate concentration of post-red sand effluents. The “patched” columns represents the average phosphate concentration of post-chitosan filter effluents. The black sample bars at times t = 0, 48 hours indicate the post-red sand effluents from fresh input of wastewater. The sampling for a) was conducted during the period of June 2015 - July 2015 and b) during the months of May and June 2015. All values were average phosphate concentration of 3 separate sampling events. The error bars represent standard error (n=3).

Vegetable wash station

The hybrid filtration system was used to treat a similar type of wastewater at this site. This site introduced the sloughs of sediment and organic matter from the vegetable wash effluents after every vegetable wash into the waste streams. A similar trend was noticed when compared to the results observed at the truck wash station during the sampling periods of October to November 2014 Figure 3 and April to May 2015 Figure 4, where the wastewater source was high in phosphate content and after it allowed to flow through red sand, sediment-free wastewater was subsequently introduced into the chitosan filtration unit where there was a further reduction in the phosphate concentration. The gravity filtration of the wash effluents was able to reduce phosphate in wash effluents from ~14 μg/mL to ~1 to 2 μg/mL after passing through red sand as shown in Figure 3a & 4a. The chitosan filter unit connected in tandem, further lowered phosphate levels to ~ 0.5 μg/mL.

Figure 3: Hybrid filtration system was used to treat vegetable wash effluents during the sampling period of May 2016-June 2016. The phosphate concentration the wastewater samples (50 ml) gathered from the source of wastewater (initial/pre-red sand), after pre-treatment with red sand (post-red sand) and after passing through chitosan filter (post-chitosan), respectively. a) The pre-red sand samples exhibited high phosphate levels and underwent a drastic decrease after passing through the red-sand. The graph shown in b) are the phosphate values in the post-red sand and post-chitosan samples that were analyzed by malachite green phosphate assay showing the efficacy of the hybrid system in removing phosphate from agricultural wastewater effluents. All values represented here were average phosphate concentration of 3 separate sampling events. The error bars represent standard error (n = 3).
Figure 4: Hybrid filtration system was used to treat vegetable wash wastewater during the sampling period of May 2016-June 2016. As shown in figure a), the solid black bars, the dashed bars and dotted bars represent the phosphate concentrations in the wastewater samples (50 ml) gathered from the source of wastewater (initial/pre-red sand), after pre-treatment with red sand (post-red sand) and after passing through chitosan filter (post-chitosan), respectively. The graph shown in b) indicate phosphate values in the post-red sand and post-chitosan samples that were analyzed by malachite green phosphate assay. All values represented here were average phosphate concentration of 3 separate sampling events. The error bars represent standard error (n = 3).

At both sites, it was observed that the red sand pre-filter had removed almost all suspended solid content and the result was reflected in the sharp decrease in soluble phosphates in the effluent samples. The particulate size of the filter made it ideal for the separation of suspended solids from the influent wastewater stream. This sharp decrease in phosphate concentration was most likely due to the filtration of soil-bound phosphates by red sand as the effluent stream passed through it [25,26]. In addition to this, an attempt to regenerate the spent red sand, regeneration studies were performed with 1M ammonium acetate and 1M sodium chloride. These results, as shown in Table 2 suggest that red sand had also contributed to the adsorption of soluble phosphates from the influent wastewater. However, the amount adsorbed suggests it cannot be used for ion exchange applications for phosphate contaminated wastewater. A similar setup has been used in other studies where sand was used for a similar purpose and was very effective in removing phosphorous [10] however, the additional chitosan filtration unit connected in sequence with the red-sand filter makes it possible to adsorb soluble phosphates in the effluents. The result would ensure that the water quality meets the standards for the region (PWQO Ontario)(figure 5).

Regenerant

Phosphates Recovered (µg/ml)

NaCl

4.51 ± 0.03

CH3COONH4

3.56 ± 0.02

Table 2: Red sand (55 kg) was treated with regeneration solution (500 ml) (1M ammonium acetate or 1M sodium chloride). All values represented here were average phosphate concentration of 3 separate sampling events. The error bars represent standard error (n=3).

Figure 5: a) From left to right: Wastewater samples from the vegetable wash station (Pre-red sand effluent), after passing through red sand (Post-red sand) and the chitosan treated effluent (Post-chitosan filter). Similar results were noted at the the truckwash station. Suspended solids in the wastewater is greatly reduced after it passes through red sand. b) TSS measurements for samples (50 ml) acquired during the sampling period of May 2016-June 2016. TSS at time t = 0 hours represents the average TSS in wastewater samples before treatment of red sand at both sites. All values represented here were average phosphate concentration of 3 separate sampling events. The error bars represent standard error (n = 3).

Chemical composition of red sand (pXRD data)

The composition of the sand would give an insight on the processes that make red sand such a potent phosphate adsorbent. Upon analysis by XRD, the sand being used was comprised of various minerals and the peaks of interest matched closely with lithium aluminosilicate with an FOM of 0.83 [27], and other minerals such as CsCu2I3 [28] and Tin (II) pyrophosphate [29]. This investigation suggested that adsorption played a small role in the removal of phosphates. In addition to this, the mixture did not contain any iron salts and so, it must be removing phosphates using a different process when compared to iron-chitosan flakes (figure 6).

Figure 6: Red sand pXRD spectrum analyzed with the help of a Cu-Kα lamp (λ=1.54 Å) at a tube current of 15mA and voltage of 30kV. The major peaks match closely to Lithium aluminosilicate (LiAlSiO4), Copper iodide salt with traces of Cesium (CsCu2I3) and phosphate salts such as tin (II) pyrophosphate (Sn2P2O7). Spectrum analysis was provided courtesy of Melissa Price from Earth Sciences department, University of Windsor.

Regenerative studies of red sand

The results from the treatment of red sand with regenerant solution suggested that red sand adsorbed a small amount of soluble phosphates when compared to iron-chitosan flakes. The average soluble phosphates recovered from in the spent regeneration solution are shown in Table 2.

Conclusion

The hybrid red-sand/chitosan filtration system is a cost effective method to treat agricultural wastewater containing high TSS and phosphate content. The TSS content can be removed from the pre-filter unit and be reused for agricultural purposes as it will still contain high concentration of soil bound phosphates. Spent chitosan can be treated with ammonium acetate to elute the bound phosphates from the column and by precipitating it as struvite, it has a potential application in fertilizer production.

References

  1. Donnert D, M Salecker (2010) Elimination of Phosphorus from Waste Water by Crystallization. Environmental Technology 20(7): 735-742.
  2. Frossard E, J Bauer, F Lothe (1997) Evidence of vivianite in FeSO4-flocculated sludges. Water research 31(10): 2449-2454.
  3. Baker MJ, DW Blowes, CJ Ptacek (1998) Laboratory development of permeable reactive mixtures for the removal of phosphorus from onsite wastewater disposal systems. Environmental science & technology 32(15): 2308-2316.
  4. Choi SS, YJ Yoo (2000) Removal of phosphate in a sequencing batch reactor by Staphylococcus auricularis. Biotechnology letters 22(19): 1549-1552.
  5. Chevalier P, D Proulx, P Lessard, WF Vincent, J de la Noüe (2000) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal by high latitude mat-forming cyanobacteria for potential use in tertiary wastewater treatment. Journal of Applied Phycology 12(2): 105-112.
  6. An B, Ka Young Jung, Sang Hyup Lee, Seunghak Lee, Jae Woo Choi (2014) Effective Phosphate Removal from Synthesized Wastewater Using Copper–Chitosan Bead: Batch and Fixed-Bed Column Studies. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 225: 2050.
  7. Bhaumik A, S Inagaki (2001) Mesoporous titanium phosphate molecular sieves with ion-exchange capacity. J Am Chem Soc 123(4): 691-696.
  8. Vanrolleghem PA, Jacob Carstensen, Bengt Carlssont (1996) Integration of wastewater treatment plant design and operation-A systematic approach using cost functions. Water Science and Technology 34(3-4): 159-171.
  9. Umble A, L Ketchum (1997) A strategy for coupling municipal wastewater treatment using the sequencing batch reactor with effluent nutrient recovery through aquaculture. Water Science and Technology 35(1): 177-184.
  10. Vohla C, Põldvere E, Noorvee A, Kuusemets V, Mander U (2005) Alternative filter media for phosphorous removal in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 40(6-7): 1251-1264.
  11. Kern J, C Idler (1999) Treatment of domestic and agricultural wastewater by reed bed systems. Ecological Engineering 12(1-2): 13-25.
  12. Helfferich FG (1962) Ion exchange. Courier Corporation pp. 622.
  13. Ćurković L, Š Cerjan Stefanović, T Filipan (1997) Metal ion exchange by natural and modified zeolites. Water research 31(6): 1379-1382.
  14. BayramoÄŸlu G, MY Arica (2008) Adsorption of Cr (VI) onto PEI immobilized acrylate-based magnetic beads: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamics study. Chemical Engineering Journal 139(1): 20-28.
  15. Guibal E (2004) Interactions of metal ions with chitosan-based sorbents: a review. Separation and Purification Technology 38(1): 43-74.
  16. Terreux R, M Domard, C Viton, A Domard (2006) Interactions study between the copper II ion and constitutive elements of chitosan structure by DFT calculation. Biomacromolecules 7(1): 31-37.
  17. Benavente M (2008) Adsorption of metallic ions onto chitosan: equilibrium and kinetic studies. KTH chemical science and engineering p. 3-55.
  18. Ogawa K, K Oka, T Yui (1993) X-ray study of chitosan-transition metal complexes. Chemistry of materials 5(5): 726-728.
  19. Ruiz M, A Sastre, E Guibal (2002) Pd and Pt recovery using chitosan gel beads. I. Influence of the drying process on diffusion properties. Separation science and technology 37(9): 2143-2166.
  20. Selmer Olsen, E, H Ratnaweera, R Pehrson (1996) A novel treatment process for dairy wastewater with chitosan produced from shrimp-shell waste. Water Science and Technology 34(11): 33-40.
  21. Shimizu Y, Satoshi nakamura, Yoshihiro S (2008) Removal of phosphate ions with a chemically modified chitosan/metal-ion complex. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 107(3): 1578-1583.
  22. Yoshida H, A Okamoto, T Kataoka (1993) Adsorption of acid dye on cross-linked chitosan fibers: equilibria. Chemical Engineering Science 48(12): 2267-2272.
  23. Hamoda M, I Al Ghusain, N Al Mutairi (2004) Sand filtration of wastewater for tertiary treatment and water reuse. Desalination 164(3): 203-211.
  24. Rajala RL, Pulkkanen M, Pessi M, Heinonen Tanski H (2003) Removal of microbes from municipal wastewater effluent by rapid sand filtration and subsequent UV irradiation. Water Sci Technol 47(3): 157-162.
  25. Chien S, W Clayton (1980) Application of Elovich equation to the kinetics of phosphate release and sorption in soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44(2): 265-268.
  26. Holtan H, L Kamp Nielsen, A Stuanes (1988) Phosphorus in soil, water and sediment: an overview. Hydrobiologia 170(1): 19-34.
  27. Xu H, J Heaney Peter H Beall George (2000) Phase transitions induced by solid solution in stuffed derivatives of quartz: A powder synchrotron XRD study of the LiAlSiO4-SiO2 join. In American Mineralogist 85: 971-979.
  28. Jouini N, L Guen, M Tournoux (1980) Structure cristalline de CsCu2I3. Rev Chim Mineral 17: 486-491.
  29. Chernaya VV, Alexander S Mitiaev, Pavel S Chizhov, Evgeny V Dikarev, Roman V, Shpanchenko et al. (2005) Synthesis and Investigation of Tin (II) Pyrophosphate Sn2P2O7. Chemistry of Materials 17(2): 284-290.
© 2014-2016 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy