Journal of ISSN: 2469 - 2786 JBMOA

Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access
Mini Review
Volume 3 Issue 1 - 2016
Gram-Positive Anaerobes in Periodontal Pathogenesis: New Kids on the Block? - A Mini Review
Bagavad Gita J1, Chandrasekaran SC1, Dhivya darshani D1 and A Gnanamani2*
1Department of Periodontics, Bharath University, India
2Division of Microbiology, Central Leather Research Institute, India
Received: October 27, 2016 | Published: November 16, 2016
*Corresponding author: A Gnanamani, Division of Microbiology, Central Leather Research Institute, CSIR-CLRI, Adyar, Chennai 20, Tamil Nadu, India, Email:
Citation: Gita JB, Chandrasekaran SC, Darshani DD, Gnanamani A (2016) Gram-Positive Anaerobes in Periodontal Pathogenesis: New Kids on the Block? - A Mini Review. J Bacteriol Mycol Open Access 3(1): 00052. DOI: 10.15406/jbmoa.2016.03.00052


Periodontal diseases are a group of chronic inflammatory, polymicrobial infections, which result in gradual loss of tooth attachment to the bone and eventual loss of the tooth. The microbial etiology of periodontitis is defined by the sub gingival plaque biofilm in which resides an interdependent microbial community containing numerous species of bacteria. Many Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia, were considered as keystone pathogens and a pre-requisite for periodontal disease activity and progression. However, with the advent of open-ended molecular techniques such as 16s rRNA sequencing and cloning, organisms that were not considered pathogenic to periodontal infections are now emerging as possible contributors to the microbial etiology of periodontitis. Among these, the Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria are in the forefront. Over the past decade, various studies have showed the association of GPA with periodontal disease conditions. However, their absolute role in the same has not been clearly defined. This mini review aims at a comprehensive analysis of the literature available on the association of GPA (Gram Positive Anaerobes) with various periodontal disease conditions.

Keywords: Chronic periodontitis; Keystone pathogens; Polymicrobial synergy dysbiosis; Gram positive anerobes; Diabetes mellitus; Cardiovascular diseases


PSD Model: Polymicrobial Synergy Dysbiosis model; GPA: Gram Positive Anaerobes; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic Acid


Periodontitis is a polymicrobial infection leading to chronic inflammation of the supporting structures of the teeth that leads to pocket formation and breakdown of alveolar bone around the teeth, resulting in tooth loss [1]. Besides it’s local impact, periodontal infections are also associated with various far-reaching systemic effects, like diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases [2].

Advances in molecular research and the oral microbiome [3] study have depicted the number of oral bacteria (cultivable and not) to a mind-boggling 700 species! The subgingival biofilm is the primary etiology of periodontal disease initiation and progression and for this reason periodontal microbiology has been the focus of research over centuries. It has gone through paradigm shifts of ideologies over the past century such as the non-specific/specific plaque hypotheses, the ecological plaque hypothesis and recently the PSD model. The “Non-Specific Plaque Hypothesis” proposed by Black and Miller in the late 1800s, believed that the total microflora could lead to disease. The “Specific Plaque Hypothesis”, which followed in 1976 concluded that only a few species of the total microflora are actively involved in disease taking into account differences in virulence among bacteria. The “Ecological Plaque Hypothesis” put forward by Marsh [4] in 1994, emphasized that periodontal disease is the result of an imbalance in the microflora by ecological stress resulting in an enrichment of certain disease-related micro-organisms. “Keystone-Pathogen Hypothesis” in 2012 [5] proposes that certain low-abundance microbial pathogens can cause inflammatory disease by interfering with the host immune system and remodeling the microbiota.

Current Scenario of Periodontal Microbiology

The past few decades of periodontal microbial research have been spent primarily on certain keystone pathogens (mostly Gram-negative anaerobes), which were believed to be positively associated with periodontal disease. The currently accepted model of periodontal pathogenesis, however, believes that periodontitis is initiated by a synergistic and dysbiotic microbial community rather than by certain select keystone pathogens. Virulent pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, elevate the virulence of the entire biofilm community following interactive communication with accessory pathogens such as mitis group streptococci. This impairs the host immune surveillance and creates a dysbiotic environment eventually disrupting tissue homeostasis and causing destruction of periodontal tissues. This led to the currently believed model of periodontal pathogenesis, that is, polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis or PSD model [6].

This advancement in our understanding has made been possible, due to open-ended molecular techniques such as DNA-DNA checkerboard hybridization techniques and 16s rRNA cloning and the revolutionary oral microbiome study in 2010. Newer microorganisms which were previously associated with periodontal health have now been found to be contributing to the periodontal disease process [7-11].

Of these, Gram-positive anaerobes such as Filifactor alocis, Peptostreptococcus micros and Eubacterium nodatum which have been recently isolated from patients with periodontitis, are emerging to be considered as important contributors to the bacterial etiology of periodontitis. However, the literature evidence is controversial and inconsistent across various studies. This discrepancy could be explained by geographic variability [12], or by difference in the depths of the pockets sampled [13], as well as the sample size and the DNA analytic bias [14].

This review article aims to search all the available literature associating GPA and periodontal disease and draw a conclusion about the validity of GPA contributing significantly to periodontal pathology.

Gram-Positive Bacteria in Periodontal Disease

Classification system of bacteria discovered by Gram in 1884, allows a large proportion of clinically important bacteria to be classified as either Gram positive or negative. The following flow chart depicts the classification system of Gram +ve species in detail (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Classification system of Gram Positive species.

The potentially pathogenic role of bacteria, which were not considered as primary keystone pathogens in periodontal disease, has been implicated in periodontal literature time and again. Paul Keyes, way back in 1970, said - “I am convinced that although many clinicians and investigators do not exclude the role of bacteria in periodontal lesions, at this point interest in microorganisms often dissipates and attention shifts to other areas”.

Gram-positive anaerobes have been isolated way back in 1990s from periodontal biofilms [15]. Kumar et al. [8] also identified the dominance of Gram positive anaerobic species in periodontally diseased sites compared to healthy individuals [8]. In another study supporting this evidence, Haffajee & Socransky et al. [16] examined supragingival biofilm samples to understand the nature of the microbial complexes that exist in supra-gingival plaque. An interesting observation was that Eubacterium nodatum, a Gram-positive anaerobe was found both in the mature and the long-term redevelopment biofilms along with the red complex species, P. gingivalis, T. forsythia, and T. denticola usually observed in subgingival plaque. Not surprisingly the same research group while studying the subgingival samples found merit in including E. nodatum as a part of the red complex.

Characteristics of a Few Gram-Positive Anaerobes Commonly Identified in Periodontal Disease and Evidence Linking them to Periodontal Disease

Eubacterium nodatum is an obligate anaerobe, filamentous or club-shaped asaccharolytic, Gram-positive rod. They grow slowly in culture and share cultural, biochemical, or morphological characteristics with other well-known species of anaerobic bacteria. They elaborate virulence factors such as esterases, acid phosphatases and aminopeptidases and have been isolated from a significant proportion of the subgingival microbiota of chronic periodontitis ranging from 10.8 to 54% [17]. Three species, E. nodatum, Eubacterium timidum, and Eubacterium brachy, have been described, primarily from subgingival samples taken from patients with moderate and severe periodontitis [18].

Parvimonas micra is a species of the orange microbial complex put forward by Socransky et al. [13] The presence of P. micra has been positively associated with periodontitis over the past 2 decades. Previously known as Peptostreptococcus micros, this Gram-positive, micro- aerophiliccoccus is usually associated with polymicrobial infections such as intracranial abscesses, sinus infections, and periodontitis. Peptostreptococcus sp. are colonisers of the oral cavity, vagina, skin, GI tract and urinary tract. They are also found to cause systemic infections such as abscesses, necrotizing tissue infections, and infections of GIT and urinary tract in immunocompromised individuals. P. micra possesses several virulence factors that contribute to its pathogenic potential. The cell wall of P. micra has been shown to induce a potent inflammatory response in macrophages [19,20]. They elaborate proteases that enable it to penetrate the basement membrane [21]. It also makes a carbohydrate- mediated co-aggregation with Fusobacterium nucleatum and Porphyromonas gingivalis [19]. These data suggest that peptostreptococci may play a role in preventing wound healing in chronic disease and may be important in the physical structure of a disease-associated biofilm.

Filifactor alocis is a fastidious, Gram-positive, obligatory anaerobic rod possessing trypsin-like enzymatic activity similar to P. gingivalis and T. denticola. It has the ability to survive in the periodontal pocket and shares common virulence properties with Fusobacterium. Filifactor alocis (ATCC 35896T) was first isolated in 1985 from the human gingival crevice as Fusobacterium alocis and later reclassified as Filifactor alocis. Oxidative stress resistance- Sialidase activity exhibited by F alocis results in release of sialic acids that scavenge oxidative stress in the periodontal pocket [22]. The fastidious nature of this organism has contributed to its low detection in culture- based methods. The organism is associated to cause endodontic infection and periodontal destruction. This organism has been found in elevated numbers in Aggressive Periodontitis (77.8%) and Chronic Periodontitis (76.7%) compared with periodontally healthy individuals due to its potential to withstand oxidative stress and inflammatory microenvironment provided by periodontal pocket [17].

A study by Dahlen & Leonhardt [18] concluded that F. alocis should be added to the 12 species used for routine diagnostics of periodontitis-associated bacterial flora. This is one of the marker organisms and is considered an important periodontal pathogen. The organism is now identified to be significant to the pathogenic structure of biofilms associated with periodontal inflammation [23-25]. In comparison with the other traditional periodontal pathogens, the high incidence of F. alocis in the periodontal pocket compared with its absence in healthy individuals or those who are periodontitis- resistant has highlighted its importance in the infectious disease process [17,23,24].

Streptococcus sanguinis are Gram-positive cocci are non-motile and non-spore forming Pili of S. sanguinis bind to salivary α-amylase, and contribute to the formation of biofilm on saliva-coated surfaces. They initiate aggregation of other oral bacteria and maturation of dental plaque. Sortase A (SrtA) of S. sanguinis have an influence on the expression of various cell surface virulence factors [26].

E. Streptococcus parasanguinis are Gram-positive, non-motile, non-spore forming cocci. They are facultative anaerobes. The long peritrichous fimbriae of S. parasanguinis are critical for the formation of biofilms on solid surfaces [27]. It is one of the major early colonizers of dental surfaces in the human oral cavity. Fim A protein is a potential virulence factor.

A description of the various studies associating Gram-positive anaerobes and periodontal disease is elaborated in Table 1.


Technique/Method of Bacterial Identification



Chi-Ying Tsai et al. [28]

16S rRNA metagenomic approach and (qPCR)

Peptostreptococcus Filifactor alocis

Six genera, including Porphyromonas, Treponema, Tannerella, Aggregatibacter, Peptostreptococcus, and Filifactor, were significantly enriched in the diseased group

Feres et al. [29]

Checker-board DNA DNA hybridisation

Eubacterium nodatum and Parvimonas micra

Studied subgingival recolonisation in smokers before and after treatment. Two species from the orange complex (Eubacterium nodatum and Parvimonas micra) showed reduction at day 0 and at 63 days post- therapy (p < 0.05).

Anna Paula Vierra Colombo et al. [30]

Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization

Peptostreptococcus anaerobius

Peptostreptococcus anaerobius were prevalent in the CP group in the highest mean counts (>4x 10 5). It was also detected in higher counts in areas where PD/CAL were greater than or equal to 4mm.

Matthew Mason et al. [31]

16S pyrotag sequencing

F. alocis

High levels of F. alocis in periodontally healthy smokers.

Al Hebshi et al. [32]

Taqman q-PCR assay

Parvimonas micra

P. micra showed the strongest association with the disease being present at significantly higher absolute and relative counts in periodontitis sites in all study subjects.

Moon et al. [33]

16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing

Filifactor alocis

Among species-level taxa occupying > 1% of whole subgingival microbiome of smokers, higher abundance (≥ 2.0-fold compared to non-smokers) of seven species or operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was found: Fusobacterium nucleatum, Neisseria sicca, Neisseria oralis, Corynebacterium matruchotii, Veillonella dispar, Filifactor alocis, and Fretibacterium AY349371

Talita Gomes Baeta Lourenco et al. [34]

Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray (HOMIM)

Peptostreptococcaceae sp

Presence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Peptostreptococcaceae sp., P. alactolyticus were associated with aggressive periodontitis.

Pérez-Chaparro  [35] A systematic review

Filifactor alocis

Four microorganisms of the 17 taxa included in the moderate evidence category are not-yet-cultivable, and 13 have been cultivated before. Five of the cultivable species are Gram positive (Eubacterium saphenum, Mogibacterium timidum, Peptostreptococcus stomatis, Filifactor alocis and Enterococcus faecalis), characteristics of most of the microorganisms involved in polymicrobial infections.

Fine and co-workers [36]


P. micra, F. alocis, Peptostreptococcus sp., Streptococcus parasanguinis

A.actinomycetemcomitans positive adolescents who presented bone loss had also high prevalence of P. micra, F. alocis, and Peptostreptococcus sp.At vulnerable sites, A. actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus parasanguinis, and F. alocis levels were elevated prior to bone loss.

Wilson Aruni et al. [37]

16s rRNA gene sequencing

F. alocis

During the invasion of HeLa cells, there was increased expression of several of the genes encoding these proteins in the potentially more virulent F. alocis D-62D compared to F. alocis ATCC 35896, the type strain.

Ann Griffen et al. [38]

16S rRNA sequencing

Filifactor alocis

Filifactor alocis and many Spirochetes were represented by a large fraction of sequences as compared with previously identified targets.

Ana Paula Colombo et al. [39]

Human Oral Microbe Identification Microarray (HOMIM)

alocis, Eubacterium spp, Parvimonas micra, Peptostreptococcus spp.

Most species/cluster decreased significantly in prevalence after treatment (p<0.05, Chi-square test), Filifactoralocis, Eubacterium spp., Parvimonas micra, Peptostreptococcus spp.,

Shaddox et al. [40]

16S rRNA-based microarrays

P.micra, F. alocis

In addition to A actinomycetemcomitans, the species P.micra, F. alocis, were more prevalent in localized AgP than in healthy children.

Catherine Moffatt et al. [41]

Routine culture

F. alocis

F. alocis has characteristics in common with established periodontal pathogens and has the potential to contribute to periodontal tissue destruction.

Wilson Aruni et al. [42]

16s rRNA gene sequencing

F. alocis

F. alocis has virulence properties that may enhance its ability to survive and persist in the periodontal pocket and may play an important role in infection-induced periodontal disease.

Abusleme et al. [43]

454-pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene libraries and q-PCR

Eubacterium species

Increase of Eubacterium species was associated with periodontal destruction along with a shift in composition of the subgingival microbial communities.

Sebastian Schlafer et al. [25]

PCR and dot blot hybridization

F. alocis

While the majority of patients suffering from GAP or CP harboured F. alocis, it was rarely detected in the control group.

Urban et al. [44]

Culture and commercial PCR based hybridization methods

Parvimonas micra

Parvimonas micra was cultured and identified only in 38% of the samples and only in 14% of the specimens were found in high number (105 CFU/ml). Fewer than 20% of the samples contained in detectable numbers are E. nodatum.

Shchipkova et al. [45]

16s cloning and sequencing

Parvimonas micra

Parvimonas micra formed a large fraction of the subgingival microbial community in smokers

Haffajee et al. [46]

Checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization

Eubacterium nodatum

For the 824 subjects the consensus pathogens P. gingivalis and T. forsythia as well as Eubacterium nodatum and Treponema denticola had significantly higher mean counts, proportions and percentage of sites colonized in samples from subjects with periodontitis than from periodontally healthy subjects.

Kumar et al. [24]

Ribosomal 16S cloning and

F. alocis

F. alocis accounted for 1.5% of all clones, and higher levels of F.alocis were seen in the group whose periodontal health worsened. Peptostreptococci did not show any statistically significant association with disease in this study

Kumar et al. [24]

Ribosomal 16S cloning and

PeptostreptococcusFilifactor alocis

Several genera, many of them uncultivated, were associated with periodontitis, the most numerous of which were Gram positive, including Peptostreptococcusand Filifactor

Booth et al. [47]

Oligonucleotide probe for E.nodatum detected by chemiluminscent method.

E. nodatum

E. nodatum and S. exigua were associated with clinical indicators of periodontal disease

Kumar et al. [23]

PCR amplification of the 16S rDNA and the downstream intergenic spacer region (ISR).

Peptostreptococcus micros

Peptostreptococcus micros commonly found in subjects with chronic periodontitis than in healthy subjects, P < 0.05. Eubacterium saphenum, Filifactor alocis were detected (P<0.002).

Van Winkelhoff et al. [48]


P. micra and Fusobacterium nucleatum

The mean percentage of total count of P. micra and Fusobacterium nucleatum were higher in both untreated and treated smokers.

Tanner et al. [49]

Filifactor alocis

Filifactor alocis has been seen more commonly in sites with periodontitis than in healthy sites

Rams et al. [15]

P. micros

In a cross-sectional study involving 907 people reported prevalence of P. micros in 58-63% of periodontitis subjects. In culture-positive patients, P. micros averaged 12-15% of total viable counts and it was concluded to be potential pathogen in adult periodontitis.


As evident from the above literature review, a number of Gram-positive anaerobes such as Filifactor alocis, Parvimonas micra, Eubacterium nodatum and Streptococcus parasanguinis are now considered as potential periodontal pathogens [50-52]. But these findings are not consistent across all studies. The possible contributory factors to this variability are study design, the population studied and the methods of detection of microorganisms. Also, we need to keep in mind while interpreting the results of association studies, the “causal versus casual” concept. Analysis of the associations based on the Hill’s criteria of causality can give us an insight into this aspect.

The paradigm shift in the understanding of periodontal pathogenesis is attributed to the introduction of novel theories about the ecological events associated with periodontal destruction. The Polymicrobial Synergy and Dysbiosis model makes us question the individual role of these Gram-positive anaerobes implicated in periodontal pathogenesis [53-55]. This has to be confirmed by future studies. Further, whether they fulfill all of Koch’s postulates in being an infectious organism is yet to be studied.

This mini review clearly highlights that the etiology of periodontitis is more complex than a previous model associating Gram-positive bacteria with health and implicating Gram-negative bacteria as the causative agents in disease. Whether Gram Positive Anaerobes contribute independently to the periodontal pathogenesis is to be decided by further uniformly designed studies and future systematic reviews [56-59].


  1. Page RC, Offenbacher S, Schroeder HE, Seymour GJ, Kornman KS (1997) Advances in the pathogenesis of periodontitis: Summary of developments, clinical implications and future directions. Periodontol 2000 14: 216-248.
  2. Maurizio T, Kenneth SK (2013) Special issue: Periodontitis and Systemic Diseases - Proceedings of a workshop jointly held by the European Federation of Periodontology and American Academy of Periodontology. J Periodontol 84(4-s): S1-S214.
  3. Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner AC, et al, (2010) The Human Oral Microbiome. J Bacteriol 192(19): 5002-5017.
  4. Marsh PD (1994) Microbial ecology of dental plaque and its significance in health and disease. Adv Dent Res 8(2): 263-271.
  5. Hajishengallis G, Liang S, Payne MA, Hashim A, Jotwani R, et al. (2011) Low-abundance biofilm species orchestrates inflammatory periodontal disease through the commensal microbiota and complement. Cell Host Microbe 10(5): 497-506.
  6. Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ (201) Beyond the red complex and into more complexity: the polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model of periodontal disease etiology. Mol Oral Microbiol 27(6): 409-419.
  7. Laksmana T, Kittichotirat W, Huang Y, Chen W, Jorgensen M, et al. (2012) Metagenomic analysis of subgingival microbiota following non-surgical periodontal therapy: a pilot study. Open Dent J 6: 255-261.
  8. Kumar PS, Griffen AL, Moeschberger ML, Leys EJ (2005) Identification of candidate periodontal pathogens and beneficial species by quantitative 16S clonal analysis. J Clin Microbiol 43(8): 3944-3955.
  9. Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Campbell JH, Firestone ND, Kumar PS, et al. (2012) Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. ISME J 6(6): 1176-1185.
  10. Liu B, Faller LL, Klitgord N, Mazumdar V, Ghodsi M, et al. (2012) Deep sequencing of the oral microbiome reveals signatures of periodontal disease. PLoS One 7(6): e37919.
  11. Wang J, Qi J, Zhao H, He S, Zhang Y, et al. (2013) Metagenomic sequencing reveals microbiota and its functional potential associated with periodontal disease. Sci Rep 3: 1843.
  12. Nasidze I, Li J, Quinque D, Tang K, Stoneking M (2009) Global diversity in the human salivary microbiome. Genome Res 19(4): 636-643.
  13. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL (1998) Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque. J Clin Periodontol 25(2): 134-144.
  14. Von Wintzingerode F, Gobel UB, Stackebrandt E (1997) Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 21(3): 213-219.
  15. Rams TE, Feik D, Listgarten MA, Slots J (1992) Peptostreptococcus micros in human periodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 7(1): 1-64.
  16. Haffajee AD, Socransky SS, Patel MR, Song X (2008) Microbial complexes in supragingival plaque. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23(3): 196-205.
  17. Wade WG (1996) The Role of Eubacterium Species in Periodontal Disease and Other Oral Infections. Microbial ecology in health and disease 9(6): 367-370.
  18. Dahlen G, Leonhardt A (2006) A new checkerboard panel for testing bacterial markers in periodontal disease. Oral Microbiol Immunol 21(1): 6-11.
  19. Hill GB, Ayers OM, Kohan AP (1987) Characteristics and Sites of Infection of Eubacterium nodatum, Eubacterium timidum, Eubacterium brachy, and Other Asaccharolytic Eubacteria. J Clin Microbiol 25(7): 1540-1545.
  20. Kremer BH, van Steenbergen TJ (2000) Peptostreptococcus micros coaggregates with Fusobacterium nucleatum and non-encapsulated Porphyromonas gingivalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 182: 57-62.
  21. Tanabe S, Bodet C, Grenier D (2007) Peptostreptococcus micros cell wall elicits a pro-inflammatory response in human macrophages. J Endotoxin RCS 13(4): 219-226.
  22. Grenier D, Bouclin R (2006) Contribution of proteases and plasmin-acquired activity in migration of Peptostreptococcus micros through a reconstituted basement membrane. Oral Microbiol Immunol 21(5): 319-325.
  23. Kumar PS, Griffen AL, Barton JA, Paster BJ, Moeschberger ML, et al. (2003) New bacterial species associated with chronic periodontitis. J Dent Res 82(5): 338-344.
  24. Kumar PS, Leys EJ, Bryk JM, Martinez FJ, Moeschberger ML, et al. (2006) Changes in periodontal health status are associated with bacterial community shifts as assessed by quantitative 16S cloning and sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 44(10): 3665-3673.
  25. Schlafer S, Riep B, Griffen AL, Petrich A, Hübner J, et al. (2010) Filifactor alocis - involvement in periodontal BMC Microbiol 10:66.
  26. Yamaguchi M, Terao Y, Ogawa T, Takahashi T, Hamada S, et al. (2006) Role of Streptococcus sanguinis sortase A in bacterial colonization. Microbes and Infection 8(12-13): 2791-2796.
  27. Froeliger EH, Fives Taylor P (2001) Streptococcus parasanguis fimbria-associated adhesin fap1 is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun 69(4): 2512-2519.
  28. Tsai CY, Tang CY, Tan TS, Chen KH, Liao KH, et al. (2016) Subgingival microbiota in individuals with severe chronic periodontitis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect S1684-1182(16): 30037-30038.
  29. Feres M, Bernal M, Matarazzo F, Faveri M, Duarte PM, et al. (2015) Subgingival bacterial recolonization after scaling and root planing in smokers with chronic periodontitis. Aust Dent J 60(2): 225-232.
  30. Ana Paula VC, Clarissa BM (2016) Periodontal-disease-associated biofilm: A reservoir for pathogens of medical importance. Microb Pathog 94: 27-34.
  31. Matthew RM, Philip MP, Haikady N, Shareef MD, Anis Rahman, et al. (2015) The subgingival microbiome of clinically healthy current and never smokers. ISME J 9: 268-272.
  32. Al hebshi NN, Al Alimi A, Taiyeb Ali T, Jaafar N (2015) Quantitative analysis of classical and new putative periodontal pathogens in subgingival biofilm: a case– control study. J Periodont Res 50(3): 320-329.
  33. Moon JH1, Lee JH, Lee JY (2015) Subgingival microbiome in smokers and non-smokers in Korean chronic periodontitis Patients. Mol Oral Microbiol 30(3): 227-241.
  34. Lourenço TG, Heller D, Silva Boghossian CM, Cotton SL, Paster BJ, et al. (2014) Microbial signature profiles of periodontally healthy and diseased patients. J Clin Periodontol 41(11): 1027-1036.
  35. Pérez Chaparro PJ, Gonçalves C, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Lobão E, et al. (2014) Newly identified pathogens associated with periodontitis: a systematic review. J Dent Res 93(9): 846-858.
  36. Fine DH, Markowitz K, Fairlie K, Tischio Bereski D, Ferrendiz J, et al. (2013) A Consortium of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Streptococcus parasanguinis, and Filifactor alocis is present in sites prior to bone loss in a longitudinal study of localized aggressive periodontitis. J Clin Microbiol 51(9): 2850-2861.
  37. Aruni AW, Roy F, Sandberg L, Fletcher HM (2012) Proteome variation among Filifactor alocis strains. Proteomics 12(12): 3343 3364.
  38. Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Campbell JH, Firestone ND, Kumar PS, et al. (2012) Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing. ISME J 6(6): 1176-1185.
  39. Colombo AP, Bennet S, Cotton SL, Goodson JM, Kent R, et al. (2012) Impact of periodontal therapy on the subgingival microbiota of severe periodontitis: comparison between good responders and “refractory” subjects by the human oral microbe identification microarray (HOMIM). J Periodontol 83(10): 1279-1287.
  40. Shaddox LM, Huang H, Lin T, Hou W, Harrison PL, et al. (2012) Microbiological characterization in children with aggressive periodontitis. J Dent Res 91(10): 927-933.
  41. Moffatt CE, Whitmore SE, Griffen AL, Leys EJ, Lamont RJ (2011) Filifactor alocis interactions with gingival epithelial cells. Mol Oral Microbiol December 26(6): 365-373.
  42. Aruni AW, Roy F, Fletcher HM (2011) Filifactor alocis has virulence attributes that can enhance its persistence under oxidative stress conditions and mediate invasion of epithelial cells by porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun 79(10): 3872-3886.
  43. Abusleme L, Dupuy AK, Dutzan N, Silva N, Burleson JA, et al. (2013) The subgingival microbiome in health and periodontitis and its relationship with community biomass and inflammation. ISME J 7(5): 1016-1025.
  44. Urbán E, Terhes G, Radnai M, Gorzó I, Nagy E (2010) Detection of periodontopathogenic bacteria in pregnant women by traditional anaerobic culture method and by a commercial molecular genetic method. Anaerobe 16(3): 283-288.
  45. Shchipkova AY, Nagaraja HN, Kumar PS (2010) Subgingival microbial profiles of smokers with periodontitis. J Dent Res 89(11): 1247-1253.
  46. Shchipkova AY, Nagaraja HN, Kumar PS (2010) Subgingival Microbial Profiles of Smokers with Periodontitis. J Dent Res 89(11): 1247-1253.
  47.  Booth V, Downes J, Van den Berg J, Wade WG (2004) Gram-positive anaerobic bacilli in human periodontal disease. J Periodontol Res 39(4): 213-220.  
  48. Van Winkelhoff AJ, Bosch Tijhof CJ, Winkel EG, Van der Reijden WA (2001) Smoking affects the subgingival microflora in periodontitis. J Periodontol 72(5): 666-671.
  49. Tanner A, Maiden MF, Macuch PJ, Murray LL, Kent RL (1998) Microbiota of health, gingivitis, and initial periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 25(2): 85-98.
  50. Nezar NAH, Hussein MS (2014) Subgingival periodontal pathogens associated with chronic periodontitis in Yemenis. BMC Oral Health 14: 13.
  51. Nonnenmacher C, Dalpke A, Mutters R, Heeg K (2004) Quantitative detection of periodontopathogens by real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 59(1): 117-125.
  52. Mahajan A, Singh B, Kashyap D, Kumar A, Mahajan P (2013) Interspecies communication and periodontal disease. Scientific World Journal 2013: 765434.
  53. Murphy EC, Frick IM (2013) Gram-positive anaerobic cocci – commensals and opportunistic Pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(4): 520-553.
  54. Wu HJ, Wang AH, Jennings MP (2008) Jennings discovery of virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Chem Biol 12(1): 1-9.
  55. Marsh PD (2003) Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology 149(Pt 2): 279-294.
  56. Aruni W, Chioma O, Fletcher HM (2014) Filifactor alocis: the newly discovered kid on the block with special talents. J Dent Res 93(8): 725-732.
  57. Boles BR, Thoendel M, Singh PK (2004) Self-generated diversity produces ‘‘insurance effects’’in biofilm communities. PNAS 101(47): 16630-16635.
  58. Roberts FA, Darveau RP (2015) Microbial protection and virulence in periodontal tissue as a function of polymicrobial communities: symbiosis and Dysbiosis. Periodontol 2000 69(1): 1-27.
  59. Marsh PD, Devine DA (2011) How is the development of dental biofilms influenced by the host? J Clin Periodontol 38(Suppl 11): 28-35.
© 2014-2018 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy