Journal of ISSN: 2373-633XJCPCR

Cancer Prevention & Current Research
Case Report
Volume 6 Issue 3 - 2016
Magic Bullet and Immunotherapy against Metastasis
Vladimir Pak*
Freelance researcher, Canada
Received: November 18, 2016 | Published: December 12, 2016
*Corresponding author: Vladimir Pak, PhD, Freelance researcher, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Email: ;
Citation: Pak V (2016) Magic Bullet and Immunotherapy against Metastasis. J Cancer Prev Curr Res 6(3): 00206. DOI: 10.15406/jcpcr.2016.06.00206

Abstract

Cancer is uncontrolled cell proliferation.  Apoptosis controls the cells from inside while immune system controls the cells from outside. Cancer breaks both controls. To treat cancer one need to restore these controls. Apoptosis can be fixed with targeted chemotherapy (magic bullet) and immune tolerance can be reversed by immunotherapy. Both actions can be done with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-toxin drugs. AFP can naturally deliver the toxin through AFP receptors to cancer and powerful immune suppressive cells - myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). MDSC depletion with AFP-toxin drugs releases both innate and adaptive immunity. By this way activated immune system, together with targeted chemotherapy could effectively erase primary cancer cells and/or metastases.  

Keywords: Targeted chemotherapy; Immunotherapy; Apoptosis; Metastasis; Alpha-fetoprotein receptor-mediated endocytosis; Embryogenesis; Oncofetal proteins; MDSC

Abbreviations

AFP: Alpha-Fetoprotein; AFPR: Alpha-Fetoprotein Receptor; MDSC: Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells; NK: Natural Killers; DNA: Deoxyribonucleic Acid; CEA: Carcinoembryonic Antigen; Hcg: Human Chorionic Gonadotropin

Introduction

More than 100 years of attempts to beat cancer with magic bullet only did not bring a solution. Today, more than 90% of cancer patients die from metastasis. Cancer cells/metastasis develops from a single cell and abnormally grow to form the whole tumor. The similar process can be observed during embryogenesis: the whole body grows from a single cell. Embryo cells theoretically have half the father’s genes/proteins that should be rejected by the mother’s immune system that rarely happens. The mechanisms that protect embryo cells from the mother’s immune system during embryogenesis are aberrantly re-used by cancer cells and involve oncofetal proteins. The well-known oncofetal protein AFP [1,2] originated from embryo yolk sac and liver can grab small molecule essential nutrients into its hydrophobic pocket [3,4] and specifically deliver them into the AFP receptor-positive cells in a shuttle manner [5]. Alpha-fetoprotein receptor (AFPR) is another oncofetal protein present on majority of cancer cells. Receptor-positive embryo and cancer cells have definite benefits of targeted nutrient delivery (Figure 1). That is why AFP loaded with the different toxins was used for the targeted chemotherapy [6,7]. The AFP receptor detection on the major immune suppressive cells - MDSC - was very promising [8,9]. The mechanism of immune tolerance to the embryo and in cancer cells now could be explained by AFP-nutrient stimulation of MDSC and subsequent local suppression of the immune system (Figure 1). On the contrary, AFP-toxin drugs not only deplete cancer cells but host MDSC too (Figure 2). MDSC was announced a perspective therapeutic target in cancer treatment because its depletion removes “brakes” from both innate and adaptive immunity activation [10-12]. Compared to adaptive immunity innate immunity activation against cancer cells is more important as it does not need time and critical cell numbers to develop. The AFP-toxin drugs immunotherapy and targeted chemotherapy united anti-cancer action was successful in cancer patients [13-15].

Magic Bullet

The magic bullet must be double targeting; not only the cancer cell, but also the optimal intracellular target [16]. Intracellular targets are not equal. As a matter of fact, many toxins are directed to proliferation-associated targets such as, DNA, tubulin, phosphokinases, etc. that rely on healthy apoptosis in the subsequent step. In my opinion the toxins that are associated with apoptosis executive action should have a priority. It is due to p53, elephants, for example, have a low cancer rate than humans [17]. In majority of human cancers, mutations in the p53 gene prevent apoptosis. To overcome this issue the target for the toxin should be not DNA or the non-functional p53 but, for example mitochondrion, that is directly involved in the intrinsic apoptosis pathway after p53 [18]. The damage of mitochondrion, lysosome, endoplasmic reticulum or peroxisome membrane is fatal for any cell because membrane is a boundary between life and death. Like cell membrane damage, organelle membrane damage cannot be repaired and leads to the whole cell death by apoptosis or auto digestion. So, the toxins that destroy organelle membranes do not rely on p53, and lead to inevitable cancer cell death are preferable for the magic bullet [6]. The only problem for organelles toxins is to be internalized specifically by cancer cells. Targeted delivery to cancer cells and organelle toxin internalization can be organized with different artificial nano-vehicles but we used natural AFP [6].

Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is a different approach from chemotherapy or radiation. The latter attack cancer cells itself, while immunotherapy aims to empower the immune system to kill them. The immune system could prove a strong weapon against many cancers and offer long-term protection with reduced side effects. Two types of immunotherapy appeared recently: checkpoint inhibitors, which remove "brakes" from the immune system, allowing it to see and erase cancer cells [19]; and more sophisticated CAR T-cell therapy [20]. Both use T-cells that belong to adaptive immunity and have moderate efficacy. To potentiate the efficacy of these immunotherapies they are combined with a lot of other chemotherapies. Immunotherapy goal is to shift the balance of activating/suppressing T-cells to favor the ability of activating ones to overcome suppressors. On the other hand, to restore the natural full size immune response to cancer cells it could be helpful to use additionally immunotherapy that activates also innate immunity [21]. The example of the full immune response and its local suppression can be seen in pregnancy. Dr. Govallo has found the similarities between immune suppression in pregnancy and cancer.  During pregnancy, the mother’s immune system is generating anti-embryo response, which is neutralized by the embryo-secreted proteins leading to immune tolerance. Being “the embryo’s evil twin” a tumor generates the anti-cancer immune response, but it is suppressed by the factors secreted by cancer cells. Dr. Govallo has shown that a protein extract of human placenta effectively blocks all expressions of cell immunity. To remove “brakes” from the immune system he immunized cancer patients with placental proteins. Placental protein injections lead to elimination of immune tolerance to the tumor, reduction of the tumor mass and decreased production of immune blocking factors. Statistics in his book show a 77.1% 5-year survival rate in the group of 35 patients with metastases of different cancers [22]. The "brakes" removal therapy of cancer through the use of placental/oncofetal proteins provides a new type of immunotherapy. Hence, immunization with the mixture of AFP, AFPR, CEA, hCG and other oncofetal proteins is likely responsible for the reversal of immune tolerance to tumor [23]. The individual proteins of the extract yet should be identified but AFP is the major one of them [24]. Embryo secreted AFP penetrates into the mother’s blood and together with the sex hormones [25] participates in immune tolerance to the embryo [26]. AFPR was detected on the powerful immune suppressive cells - MDSC [8,9,27,28]. By delivering nutrients to MDSC, AFP stimulates their suppressive activity (Figure 1). MDSC may be the major “brakes” of the immune system and are responsible for immune tolerance to the embryo and cancer cells. Hence, to reverse tolerance to cancer cells AFP was loaded with the toxin. AFP-toxin drug following the natural way was internalized by MDSC and depleted them [9]. The magic bullet targeted to MDSC became a new type of immunotherapy. MDSC-targeted immunotherapy removes "brakes" from both innate and adaptive immunity and has a great potential [29-31] (Figure 2). AFP-mitochondrion toxin drug in a very low dose effectively erased liver metastasis [14] (Figure 3).

Figure 1: Delivering nutrient to MDSC and cancer cells through AFPR-mediated endocytosis AFP stimulates accordingly immune tolerance and tumor growth.

Figure 2: AFP-toxin drug depletes cancer cells and MDSC that in its turn removes “brakes” from innate and adaptive immunity to kill cancer cells.

Figure 3: CT scan with liver metastasis (arrow) and its elimination in 8 weeks with AFP-toxin drug.

Conclusion

The magic bullet is not enough to beat cancer. The united action of both targeted chemotherapy and immunotherapy is a rational way to treat cancer. Adaptive immunity can be activated with e.g., checkpoint inhibitors, but oncologists need also innate immunity activators. Innate immunity can destroy the primary cancer cells/metastasis while adaptive immunity needs a bigger cell number and time in order to develop specific response. MDSC - targeted immunotherapy has a great potential. MDSC controls both innate and adaptive immunity and are involved in immune tolerance to cancer and autoimmune diseases. They demonstrate AFPR and can be specifically targeted by AFP-toxin drug. This drug can deplete MDSC, thus immune tolerance to cancer cells will be broken. Activated NK and T- cells effectively erase metastasis. Natural delivery vehicle AFP loaded with the toxin plays dual role in metastasis depletion: as targeted chemotherapy and immunotherapy where the second one is more important and dominating with low doses (Figure 2). Low doses make it possible to combine AFP-toxin therapy with any other therapies for better patients' outcomes. Other oncofetal proteins should be tested on immune modulation.

References

  1. Mizejewski GJ (2001) Alpha-fetoprotein structure and function: relevance to isoforms, epitopes, and conformational variants. Exp Biol. Med 226(5): 377-408.
  2. Lakhi N, Moretti M (2016) Alpha-fetoprotein: functions and clinical applications. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, USA.
  3. Terentiev AA, Moldogazieva NT, Levtsova OV, Maximenko DM, Borozdenko DA, et al. (2012) Modeling of three dimensional structure of human alpha-fetoprotein complexed with diethylstilbestrol: docking and molecular dynamics simulation study. J Bioinform Comput Biol 10(2): 1241012.
  4. Shen J, Zhang W, Fang H, Perkins R, Tong W, et al. (2013) Homology modeling, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations elucidated a-fetoprotein binding modes. BMC Bioinformatics 14(Suppl 14): S6.
  5. Torres JM, Geuskens M, Uriel J (1991) Receptor-mediated endocytosis and recycling of alpha-fetoprotein in human B-lymphoma and T-leukemia cells. Int J Cancer 47(1): 110-117.
  6. Pak V (2014) The use of alpha-fetoprotein for the delivery of cytotoxic payloads to cancer cells. Ther Deliv 5(8): 885-892.
  7. Arshad NM, In LLA, Soh TL, Azmi MN, Ibrahim H, et al. (2015) Recombinant human alpha fetoprotein synergistically potentiates the anti-cancer effects of 1'-S-1'- acetoxychavicol acetate when used as a complex against human tumours harbouring AFP-receptors. Oncotarget 6: 1-17.
  8. Atemezem A, Mbemba E, Marfaing R, Vaysse J, Pontet, et al. (2002) Human alpha-fetoprotein binds to primary macrophages. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 296(3): 507-514.
  9. Pak VN, Belyaev NN (2016) Alpha-fetoprotein-mediated immune tolerance and its reversal. In: Lakhi N, Moretti M. (editors) Alpha-fetoprotein: functions and clinical applications. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, USA, pp. 353-374.
  10. Serafini P, Bronte V (2014) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in tumor-induced T cell suppression and tolerance. In: Tumor-induced immune suppression. Mechanisms and therapeutic reversal. Gabrilovich DI & Hurwitz AA (Eds.), Springer, New York, USA, pp. 99-150.
  11. Belyaev NN (2014) Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) as a main tumor induced negative regulators of cancer immunity and possible ways for their elimination. KazNU Bulletin Biology series 1(60): 79-83.
  12. Najjar YG, Finke JH (2013) Clinical perspectives on targeting of myeloid derived suppressor cells in the treatment of cancer. Frontiers in Oncology 3(49): 1-9.
  13. Pak VN, Pak NA, Reshetnikov SS, Nikonov SD, Ogirenko AP. (2005) Method for treatment of malignant neoplasms and a complex preparation having antineoplastic activity for use in such treatment. U.S. Patent 6,878,688.
  14. Pak V (2011) Compositions of alpha-fetoprotein and inducers of apoptosis for the treatment of cancer. U.S. Patent 8,071,547.
  15. Pak V, Molchanov O, Vincent M (2007) Treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with aimpila, a glycoside/alpha-fetoprotein complex. J of Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl18S): 3589.
  16. Pak V (2014) Double targeting as an effective anti-cancer strategy. 3rd International conference and exhibition on cell & gene therapy, Las Vegas, USA.
  17. Abegglen LM, Caulin AF, Chan A, Lee K, Robinson R, Campbell MS, et al. (2015) Potential Mechanisms for cancer resistance in elephants and comparative cellular response to DNA damage in humans. JAMA 314(17): 1850-1860.  
  18. Vaseva AV, Moll UM (2009) The mitochondrial p53 pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 1787(5): 414-420.
  19. Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor, et al. (2014) PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 515(7528): 568-571.
  20. Kalaitsidou M, Kueberuwa G, Schutt A, Gilham DE (2015) CAR T-cell therapy: toxicity and the relevance of preclinical models. Immunotherapy 7(5): 487-497.
  21. Belyaev NN, Bogdanov AYu, Savvulidi PG, Krasnoshtanov VK, Tleulieva RT, et al. (2008) The influence of alpha-fetoprotein on natural suppressor cell activity and Ehrlich carcinoma growth. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 12(4):193-197.
  22. Govallo VI (1993) The immunology of pregnancy and cancer. Nova Science Publishers, Commack, New York, USA.
  23. Svensson-Arvelund J, Mehta RB, Lindau R, Mirrasekhian E, Rodriguez-Martinez H, et al. (2015) The human fetal placenta promotes tolerance against the semiallogeneic fetus by inducing regulatory T cells and homeostatic M2 macrophages. J Immunol 194: 1534-1544.
  24. Newby D, Dalgliesh G, Lyall F, Aitken DA. (2005) Alphafetoprotein and alphafetoprotein receptor expression in the normal human placenta at term. Placenta 26(2-3): 190-200.
  25. Schumacher A, Costa S-D, Zenclussen AC (2014) Endocrine factors modulating immune responses in pregnancy. Front Immunol 5:196.
  26. Yamamoto M, Tatsumi T, Miyagi T, Tsunematsu H, Aketa H, et al. (2011) Alpha-fetoprotein impairs activation of natural killer cells by inhibiting the function of dendritic cells. Clin Exp Immunol 165(2): 211-219.
  27. Laderoute MP (1994) A new perspective on the nature of the cancer problem: anti-cellular senescence. Molecular Carcinogenesis 10(3): 125-133.
  28. Zubkova E, Semenkova L, Dudich E, Dudich I, Parfyonova Y, at al. (2013) Alpha-fetoprotein contributes to THP-1 cell invasion and chemotaxis via protein kinase and Gi-protein-dependent pathways. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 379(1-2): 283-293.
  29. Vincent J, Mignot G, Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Bruchard M, et al. (2010) 5-Fluorouracil selectively kills tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells resulting in enhanced T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 70(8): 3052-3061.
  30. Wesolowski R, Markowitz J, Carson III WE (2013) Myeloid derived suppressor cells - a new therapeutic target in the treatment of cancer. J ImmunoTher Cancer 1: 1-10.
  31. Marvel D, Gabrilovich DI (2015) Myeloid-derived suppressor cell in the tumor environment: expect the unexpected. J Clin Invest 125(9): 3356-3364.
© 2014-2016 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy