Journal of ISSN: 2373-6437JACCOA

Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access
Mini Review
Volume 6 Issue 4 - 2016
Jet Ventilation for Otolaryngologic Procedures - A Mini-Review
John Doyle*
Professor of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, Staff Anesthesiologist, UAE
Received: March 30, 2016 | Published: December 20, 2016
*Corresponding author: D John Doyle, Professor of Anesthesiology, Case Western Reserve University, Staff Anesthesiologist, Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Chief, Department of General Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, UAE, Email:
Citation: Doyle J (2016) Jet Ventilation for Otolaryngologic Procedures - A Mini-Review. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access 6(4): 00236. DOI: 10.15406/jaccoa.2016.06.00236


Jet ventilation is frequently used in the anesthetic management of Otolaryngologic procedures where the presence of an endotracheal tube would interfere with the surgery, as with some vocal cord lesions. (Where an endotracheal tube can be used, a narrow-bore microlaryngeal (MLT) tube (Figure 1) is often used; such a tube typically has an inner diameter of 5 mm, compared to a conventional endotracheal tube with an inner diameter between 7 and 8.5 mm). This mini-review presents the essential issues in using jet ventilation methods for otolaryngologic procedures where an endotracheal tube must be avoided.

Figure 1: A typical microlaryngeal (MLT) endotracheal tube (bottom) with a pediatric endotracheal tube (top) for comparison.  Such a tube typically has an inner diameter of 5 mm, compared to a conventional adult endotracheal tube with an inner diameter between 7 and 8.5 mm. While the small diameter of the MLT endotracheal tube allows improved surgical access to the glottic structures, in some cases even narrow bore endotracheal tubes such as the MLT interfere with  surgical access to the glottic structures, necessitating the use of a tubeless anesthetic technique such as jet ventilation. Image credit:

Ventilation techniques

Two main techniques are available for jet ventilation for otolaryngologic procedures: [1] use of a simple hand-held device and [2] use of an automatic jet ventilator system. In both cases the usual gas delivered is 100% oxygen, but because of the Venturi effect resulting in the entrainment of room air, the oxygen concentration of the resulting mixture is less than 100%.

Simple Hand-held jet ventilation devices: In the case of the hand-held device such as the unit shown in Figure 2 the operator starts operation with a driving pressure set to about around 20 psi1 (in adults) and provides manually delivered jets of a little under one second duration delivered approximately 10 to 20 times a minute. In most cases the jet ventilation apparatus is attached to an anterior commissure laryngoscope or other type of otolaryngologic laryngoscope via a screw attachment (Figure 3) to provide supraglottic ventilation. The main means of determining that ventilation is adequate is to watch the chest rise with each delivered jet pulse. For safety reasons the driving pressure should be adjusted down to the minimum needed to achieve adequate chest excursions. Note that obese individuals require higher driving pressures to achieve adequate chest excursions as compared to lean patients.

Figure 2: The Manujet III (VBM Medizintechnik GmbH, Germany) is a portable and easily adjusted medical device that can be used for manual jet ventilation. A color-coded gauge shows the proving pressure in bar and psi units.   The gas driving pressure can be adjusted between 0 and 3.5 bar (0 to  50 psi). Note that 50 psi of driving pressure is in the range of 3500 cm H2O and so can readily produce barotrauma (e.g., a pneumothorax) if not used with caution. Most of the time a driving pressure in the range of 20 psi or less is used. Image Credit:

Figure 3: An anterior commissure laryngoscope for use in otolaryngologic procedures.  Such laryngoscopes are commonly used in conjunction with a hand-held jet ventilator  such as that shown in Figure 2, but  in some cases jet ventilation can be avoided by using a narrow bore endotracheal tubes such as the MLT endotracheal tube (Figure 1). Image Credit:

Automatic jet ventilation systems: In the case of an automatic jet ventilator system, a commercial product such as that provided by the Acutronic company may be used to provide infraglottic ventilation (Figure 4). This is usually achieved in conjunction with an infraglottic ventilation catheter (Figure 5). Table 1 lists a set of ventilation parameters that are commonly used with such a unit. Note that the ventilation rates for infraglottic automatic jet ventilation systems are usually much higher (in the range of 100 per minute and upwards) than for the supraglottic manual jet ventilation systems shown in Figure 2 (which typically operate in the range of 10 to 20 breaths per minute).

Figure 4: The Acutronic Monsoon III automatic jet ventilation system.

Figure 5: The Hunsaker Mon-Jet infraglottic ventilation catheter. Image Credit:  Note that an instructional video demonstrating the use of the Hunsaker Mon-Jet infraglottic ventilation catheter can be seen online at

Anesthetic technique

After the induction of general anesthesia with propofol and muscle relaxation achieved with a paralytic such as rocuronium, anesthesia is maintained using a total intravenous (TIVA) technique such as a propofol infusion delivered at an initial rate of 100 mcg/kg/min in conjunction with a remifentanil infusion delivered at an initial rate of 0.1 mcg/kg/min. These infusions are then adjusted based on the factors such as the hemodynamics and the depth of anesthesia as guided by clinical findings and (commonly, but not always) by electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis.

In some centers it is common to add 1 mg of remifentanil to 500 mg (50 ml) of propofol and treat the combination as “superpropofol”, delivering it in a single syringe at an initial rate of 100 mcg/kg/min of propofol. When 100 mcg/kg/min of propofol is delivered in this scheme, the resulting rate of remifentanil infusion is then 0.2 mcg/kg/min. This latter arrangement has the advantage that only a single syringe pump is needed, but has the disadvantage that the two infusions cannot be independently adjusted.


Most complications associated with the use of jet ventilation are due to use of a high pressure of the delivered gas source. In particular, barotrauma leading to pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or other problems can result from the high pressures used, which can run as high as 50 psi (= 3500 cm H2O pressure). This is particularly true if gas trapping due to inadequate expiratory pathway takes place.

Take-home Points

  1. The two main techniques for jet ventilation for otolaryngologic procedures are the use of a simple hand-held device (Figure 2) and use of an automatic jet ventilator system (Figure 4), the latter which generally employs a much higher breathing frequency.
  2. Jet ventilation in conjunction with an anterior commissure laryngoscope (Figure 3) is usually supraglottic in nature and usually achieved with manual ventilation using a simple hand-held device such as that shown in Figure 2.
  3. Jet ventilation via an automatic jet ventilator system (Figure 4) is usually subglottic in nature and generally achieved using a special jet ventilation cathether such as that shown in Figure 5.
  4. Anesthesia delivery in this setting is by TIVA (total intravenous anesthesia).
  5. Complications from jet ventilation (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum) can occur from the use of high gas pressure (Table 1 & 2) [1-7].

Driving pressure (DP)

1.0 bar

Pause pressure (PP)

20 mbar

Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP)

35 mbar

Inspiratory time


Frequency (respiratory rate)


Oxygen concentration (FiO2)


Table 1: Typical settings used with the Acutronic Monsoon III Jet Ventilator (

Insertion of jet ventilator catheters (

Jet oxygenation (

Hunsaker Mon-Jet Ventilation catheter for Microlaryngoscopy (

Table 2: Helpful Instructional Videos on Jet Ventilation.

1 The term “psi”  is short for pounds per square inch. One psi equals 51.7 mmHg or 70.3 cmH2O


  1. Abe K, Oka J, Takahashi H, Funatsu T, Fukuda H, et al. (2006) Effect of high-frequency jet ventilation on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic aneurysm surgery. J Anaeth 20(1): 1-5.
  2. Biro P, Spahn DR, Pfammatter T (2009) High-frequency jet ventilation for minimizing breathing-related liver motion during percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of multiple hepatic tumours. Br. J. Anaesth 102(5): 650-653.
  3. Canty D J, Dhara S S (2009) High frequency jet ventilation through a supraglottic airway device. Anaesthesia 64(12): 1295-1298.
  4. Buczkowski P W, Fombon FN, Lin ES, Russell WC, Thompson JP (2007) Air entrainment during high-frequency jet ventilation in a model of upper tracheal stenosis. Br J Anaesth 99(6): 891-897.
  5. Raiten J, Elkassabany N, Gao W, Mandel JE (2011) Medical intelligence article: novel uses of high frequency ventilation outside the operating room. Anesth Analg 112(5): 1110-1113.
  6. Raiten J, Elkassabany N, Mandel JE (2012) The use of high-frequency jet ventilation for out of operating room anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 25(4): 482-485.  
  7. Elkassabany N, Garcia F, Tschabrunn C, Raiten J, Gao W, et al. (2012) Anesthetic management of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation using high-frequency jet ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 26(3): 433-438.
© 2014-2018 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy