Journal of ISSN: 2373-6437JACCOA

Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access
Letter to Editor
Volume 7 Issue 2 - 2017
A Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in a Pregnant Woman with a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt
Onur PALABIYIK1*, Ayse Nur KUMBASAR1, Havva SAYHAN2, Ayca TAS TUNA2 and Serkan KUMBASAR3
1Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
2Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine, Turkey
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Turkey
Received: January 09, 2017 | Published: January 18, 2017
*Corresponding author: Onur PALABIYIK, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology Intensive Care Unit, 54100 Sakarya, Turkey, Fax: +90 264 2751254; Email:
Citation: PALABIYIK O, KUMBASAR AN, SAYHAN H, TUNA AT, KUMBASAR S (2017) A Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Section in a Pregnant Woman with a Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt. J Anesth Crit Care Open Access 7(2): 00252. DOI: 10.15406/jaccoa.2017.07.00252

Letter To Editor

There is a number of case reports about anesthetic consideration in a pregnant woman with a VPS, both general and neuraxial anesthesia have been reported any complication directly associated with the anesthetic procedure [1-5]. To the best of our knowledge, a pregnant woman with a VPS was applied combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for cesarean section (C/S) has not been reported previously. Because of this, we aimed to present CSEA in a pregnant woman with a VPS for emergency C/S.

A 20-year-old pregnant woman (height; 152 cm , and weight; 88 kg), had been a VPS since she had 8 years old due to traumatic hydrocephalus, was scheduled emergency C/S at 38 weeks gestation because of fetal distress. The patient had not neurological abnormalities. Physical examination and laboratory findings were normal. The patient had been fasting for approximately two hours. Because of this condition, CSEA was planned for C/S. The patient consent was obtained. The electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oximetry were established. The patient’s baseline blood pressure, heart rate, and SpO2 were 124/67 mmHg, 92 per min, and 98%, respectively. After intravenous access was obtained, 15 ml/kg of crystalloid infusion was started rapidly and 2 g of cefazolin was injected for antibiotic prophylaxis. 4 L/min of oxygen was administered via a nasal cannula. With the patient in the sitting position, full aseptic precautions were taken. CSEA using 2 ml of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine intraspinally was applied in the midline at the L3-4 interspace. Five minutes later, the sensory block had reached the T4 dermatome and surgery was started. A 2770 g healthy girl baby was delivered. Any perioperative complications were not observed. When the sensory block was declined T10 dermatome at approximately 2 hours postoperatively, analgesia was obtained via epidural catheter with 15 ml of solution, including 3 mg morphine, 50 μg fentanyl and 0.9% NaCl. The patient was observed for 48 hours with normal neurologic and vital status without pain and discharged home on postoperative day 2. When the patient was come back to Obstetrics department for control evaluation, any complaints associated with dural puncture headache or infection were not seen.

In patients with a VPS, CSEA has increased the risk of infectious complications [1]. If a CSEA is planned, strict aseptic techniques and antimicrobial prophylaxis should be complied with [1]. Therefore, CSEA was applied in our patient under the antibiotic prophylaxis and strict aseptic condition. Our aim of using CSEA was rapidly reaching to appropriate level and quality of block with spinal block, and prolonged postoperative analgesia with epidural block. Besides, general anesthesia was avoided because of encountering with the risk of the difficult airway and gastric content aspiration in a fasting patient.

Consequently, if strict sterile condition and antibiotic prophylaxis are provided, CSEA can be applied as an effective and safe anesthetic method for emergency C/S in a patient with a VPS.

References

  1. Littleford JA, Brockhurst NJ, Bernstein EP, Georgoussis SE (1999) Obstetrical anesthesia for a parturient with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt and third ventriculostomy. Can J Anaesth 46(11): 1057-1063.
  2. Goulart AP, Moro ET, Rios Rde P, Pires RT (2009) Subarachnoid blockade for cesarean section in a patient with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: case report. Rev Bras Anestesiol 59(4): 471-475.
  3. Vybihal V, Gerychova R, Janku P, Hanoun G, Sova M, et al. (2014) [Pregnancy and delivery in patients with an implanted shunt for hydrocephalus]. Ceska Gynekol 79(4): 309-313.
  4. Nikolov A, Surchev Zh, Nalbanski B, Diavolov V, Dimitrov A (2008) [Pregnancy and delivery in women with cerebrospinal fluid shunt due to hydrocephalus]. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) 47(2): 3-10.
  5. Schiza S, Stamatakis E, Panagopoulou A, Valsamidis D (2012) Management of pregnancy and delivery of a patient with malfunctioning ventriculoperitoneal shunt. J Obstet Gynaecol 32(1): 6-9.
© 2014-2016 MedCrave Group, All rights reserved. No part of this content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means as per the standard guidelines of fair use.
Creative Commons License Open Access by MedCrave Group is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://medcraveonline.com
Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version | Opera |Privacy Policy